Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18498659›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2008

Adverse events during rotary-wing transport of mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Christopher W Seymour, Jeremy M Kahn, C William Schwab, Barry D Fuchs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Interhospital critical care transport].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Year in review 2012: Critical Care--management.Critical care (London, England) · 2013
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Adverse clinical events during intrahospital transport by a specialized team: a preliminary report.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2011
    Article
  19. Incidence and predictors of critical events during urgent air-medical transport.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher W SeymourDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Washington School of Medicine, Campus Box 356522, Seattle, WA 98195-6522, USA.
Jeremy M Kahn
C William Schwab
Barry D Fuchs

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients triaged to tertiary care centers frequently undergo rotary-wing transport and may be exposed to additional risk for adverse events. The incidence of physiologic adverse events and their predisposing factors in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing aeromedical transport are unknown.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of flight records of all interfacility, rotary-wing transports to a tertiary care, university hospital during 2001 to 2003. All patients receiving mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube or tracheostomy were included; trauma, scene flights, and fixed transports were excluded. Data were abstracted from patient flight and hospital records. Adverse events were classified as either major (death, arrest, pneumothorax, or seizure) or minor (physiologic decompensation, new arrhythmia, or requirement for new sedation/paralysis). Bivariate associations between hospital and flight characteristics and the presence of adverse events were examined.

resultsSix hundred eighty-two interfacility flights occurred during the period of review, with 191 patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Fifty-eight different hospitals transferred patients, with diagnoses that were primarily cardiopulmonary (45%) and neurologic (37%). Median flight distance and time were 42 (31 to 83) km and 13 (8 to 22) minutes, respectively. No major adverse events occurred during flight. Forty patients (22%) experienced a minor physiologic adverse event. Vasopressor requirement prior to flight and flight distance were associated with the presence of adverse events in-flight (P < 0.05). Patient demographics, time of day, season, transferring hospital characteristics, and ventilator settings before and during flight were not associated with adverse events.

conclusionMajor adverse events are rare during interfacility, rotary-wing transfer of critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Patients transferred over a longer distance or transferred on vasopressors may be at greater risk for minor adverse events during flight.

Indexed as

Air AmbulancesRespiration, ArtificialCohort StudiesCritical IllnessFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVasoconstrictor AgentsVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID18498659
PMCPMC2481462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.