Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18498109›Full record

ArticleProteins2008

How general is the nucleation-condensation mechanism?

Bengt Nölting, David A Agard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution of a protein folding nucleus.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bengt NöltingDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158-2517, USA.
David A Agard
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the structures of the major folding transition states of nine proteins by correlation of published Phi-values with inter-residue contact maps. Combined with previous studies on six proteins, the analysis suggests that at least 10 of the 15 small globular proteins fold via a nucleation-condensation mechanism with a concurrent build-up of secondary and tertiary structure contacts, but a structural consolidation that is clearly nonuniformly distributed over the molecule and most intense in a single structural region suggesting the occurrence of a single folding nucleus. However, on average helix- and sheet-forming residues show somewhat larger Phi-values in the major transition state, suggesting that secondary structure formation is one important driving force in the nucleation-condensation in many proteins and that secondary-structure forming residues tend to be more prominent in folding nuclei. We synthesize the combined information on these 10 of 15 proteins into a unified nucleation-condensation mechanism which also accounts for effects described by the framework, hydrophobic collapse, zipper, and funnel models.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingModels, ChemicalMutant ProteinsMutationProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryMutant ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID18498109
PMCPMC2776727
OpenAlexW2034030460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.