Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18497370›Full record

GuidelineHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2008

Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Thomas G Pickering, Nancy Houston Miller, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Lawrence R Krakoff, Nancy T Artinian, David Goff, American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01167920 (Virtual Hypertension Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 165 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01167920 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Hypertension Clinic (VHC) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2009 to 2014Enrolled74ConditionsHypertensionArmsVirtual Hypertension Clinic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Guideline
  15. Guideline
  16. Guideline
  17. Pooled it
  18. Masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2009
    Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas G Pickering
Nancy Houston Miller
Gbenga Ogedegbe
Lawrence R Krakoff
Nancy T Artinian
David Goff
American Heart Association
American Society of Hypertension
Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association

Funding

MULTI-SITE RCT FOR BP CONTROL IN HTN AFRICAN AMERICANSR01HL078566 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI OGEDEGBE, OLUGBENGA G. · 2004 to 2011
$4.5M
Explanatory Models of Hypertension in NigeriaR03TW007452 · FIC · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI OGEDEGBE, OLUGBENGA G. · 2006 to 2008
$100k
FIC NIH HHS R03 TW007452NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL078566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) overcomes many of the limitations of traditional office blood pressure (BP) measurement and is both cheaper and easier to perform than ambulatory BP monitoring. Monitors that use the oscillometric method are currently available that are accurate, reliable, easy to use, and relatively inexpensive. An increasing number of patients are using them regularly to check their BP at home, but although this has been endorsed by national and international guidelines, detailed recommendations for their use have been lacking. There is a rapidly growing literature showing that measurements taken by patients at home are often lower than readings taken in the office and closer to the average BP recorded by 24-hour ambulatory monitors, which is the BP that best predicts cardiovascular risk. Because of the larger numbers of readings that can be taken by HBPM than in the office and the elimination of the white-coat effect (the increase of BP during an office visit), home readings are more reproducible than office readings and show better correlations with measures of target organ damage. In addition, prospective studies that have used multiple home readings to express the true BP have found that home BP predicts risk better than office BP (Class IIa; Level of Evidence A). This call-to-action article makes the following recommendations: (1) It is recommended that HBPM should become a routine component of BP measurement in the majority of patients with known or suspected hypertension; (2) Patients should be advised to purchase oscillometric monitors that measure BP on the upper arm with an appropriate cuff size and that have been shown to be accurate according to standard international protocols. They should be shown how to use them by their healthcare providers; (3) Two to 3 readings should be taken while the subject is resting in the seated position, both in the morning and at night, over a period of 1 week. A total of >or=12 readings are recommended for making clinical decisions; (4) HBPM is indicated in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected hypertension, in whom it may distinguish between white-coat and sustained hypertension. If the results are equivocal, ambulatory BP monitoring may help to establish the diagnosis; (5) In patients with prehypertension, HBPM may be useful for detecting masked hypertension; (6) HBPM is recommended for evaluating the response to any type of antihypertensive treatment and may improve adherence; (7) The target HBPM goal for treatment is <135/85 mm Hg or <130/80 mm Hg in high-risk patients; (8) HBPM is useful in the elderly, in whom both BP variability and the white-coat effect are increased; (9) HBPM is of value in patients with diabetes, in whom tight BP control is of paramount importance; (10) Other populations in whom HBPM may be beneficial include pregnant women, children, and patients with kidney disease; and (11) HBPM has the potential to improve the quality of care while reducing costs and should be reimbursed.

Indexed as

Reimbursement MechanismsAlgorithmsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryContraindicationsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansHypertensionPatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicReproducibility of ResultsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18497370
PMCPMC2989415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.