GuidelineHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2008
Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.
Guideline in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01167920 (Virtual Hypertension Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 165 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Virtual Hypertension Clinic (VHC) Study
Who cites it
165 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of mercurial versus digital blood pressure measurement devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019Guideline
- Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review of Evidence on Clinical Utility.Current hypertension reports · 2019Pooled it
- Schedules for Self-monitoring Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review.American journal of hypertension · 2019Pooled it
- Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2018Guideline
- How Do Home and Clinic Blood Pressure Readings Compare in Pregnancy?Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2018Pooled it
- Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies.Journal of human hypertension · 2017Pooled it
- Studies comparing ambulatory blood pressure and home blood pressure on cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes: a systematic review.Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH · 2016Pooled it
- Risk stratification by self-measured home blood pressure across categories of conventional blood pressure: a participant-level meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Home blood pressure monitoring is better predictor of cardiovascular disease and target organ damage than office blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Current cardiology reports · 2013Pooled it
- Masked hypertension in diabetes mellitus: treatment implications for clinical practice.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2013Pooled it
- Age and the difference between awake ambulatory blood pressure and office blood pressure: a meta-analysis.Blood pressure monitoring · 2011Pooled it
- Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the american heart association.Circulation · 2011Guideline
- Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2011Guideline
- European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for home blood pressure monitoring.Journal of human hypertension · 2010Guideline
- Cardiovascular protection with antihypertensive drugs in dialysis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2009Pooled it
- Masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2009Pooled it
- Trial
- A pharmacist intervention for monitoring and treating hypertension using bidirectional texting: PharmText BP.Contemporary clinical trials · 2020Trial
105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) overcomes many of the limitations of traditional office blood pressure (BP) measurement and is both cheaper and easier to perform than ambulatory BP monitoring. Monitors that use the oscillometric method are currently available that are accurate, reliable, easy to use, and relatively inexpensive. An increasing number of patients are using them regularly to check their BP at home, but although this has been endorsed by national and international guidelines, detailed recommendations for their use have been lacking. There is a rapidly growing literature showing that measurements taken by patients at home are often lower than readings taken in the office and closer to the average BP recorded by 24-hour ambulatory monitors, which is the BP that best predicts cardiovascular risk. Because of the larger numbers of readings that can be taken by HBPM than in the office and the elimination of the white-coat effect (the increase of BP during an office visit), home readings are more reproducible than office readings and show better correlations with measures of target organ damage. In addition, prospective studies that have used multiple home readings to express the true BP have found that home BP predicts risk better than office BP (Class IIa; Level of Evidence A). This call-to-action article makes the following recommendations: (1) It is recommended that HBPM should become a routine component of BP measurement in the majority of patients with known or suspected hypertension; (2) Patients should be advised to purchase oscillometric monitors that measure BP on the upper arm with an appropriate cuff size and that have been shown to be accurate according to standard international protocols. They should be shown how to use them by their healthcare providers; (3) Two to 3 readings should be taken while the subject is resting in the seated position, both in the morning and at night, over a period of 1 week. A total of >or=12 readings are recommended for making clinical decisions; (4) HBPM is indicated in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected hypertension, in whom it may distinguish between white-coat and sustained hypertension. If the results are equivocal, ambulatory BP monitoring may help to establish the diagnosis; (5) In patients with prehypertension, HBPM may be useful for detecting masked hypertension; (6) HBPM is recommended for evaluating the response to any type of antihypertensive treatment and may improve adherence; (7) The target HBPM goal for treatment is <135/85 mm Hg or <130/80 mm Hg in high-risk patients; (8) HBPM is useful in the elderly, in whom both BP variability and the white-coat effect are increased; (9) HBPM is of value in patients with diabetes, in whom tight BP control is of paramount importance; (10) Other populations in whom HBPM may be beneficial include pregnant women, children, and patients with kidney disease; and (11) HBPM has the potential to improve the quality of care while reducing costs and should be reimbursed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.