ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2008
Prostate cancer susceptibility loci: finding the genes.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Volatilomics: An Emerging and Promising Avenue for the Detection of Potential Prostate Cancer Biomarkers.Cancers · 2022Review
- Survival outcomes of Asian younger men (< 55 years) undergoing radical prostatectomy: a review of prostate cancer database in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.International urology and nephrology · 2020Article
- Family history of breast cancer increases the risk of prostate cancer: results from the EPICAP study.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Inherited Predisposition to Prostate Cancer: From Gene Discovery to Clinical Impact.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2017Article
- Genome-wide differentially methylated genes in prostate cancer tissues from African-American and Caucasian men.Epigenetics · 2015Article
- Prostate cancer in young men: an important clinical entity.Nature reviews. Urology · 2014Review
- Admixture mapping of prostate cancer in African Americans participating in the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (PCaP).The Prostate · 2014Article
- The role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in prostate cancer.Asian journal of andrology · 2012Review
- Family-based association analysis of 42 hereditary prostate cancer families identifies the Apolipoprotein L3 region on chromosome 22q12 as a risk locus.Human molecular genetics · 2010Article
- Cancer risk assessment for the primary care physician.Primary care · 2009Article
- Molecular markers in prostate cancer. Part I: predicting lethality.Asian journal of andrology · 2009Review
- The role of the BRCA2 gene in susceptibility to prostate cancer revisited.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies to date suggest that PC is a genetically very heterogeneous disease. High-risk families, in which multiple men are affected likely, reflect the contributions of a number of genes, some that are rare and highly penetrant, while others are more common and weakly penetrant. In this review, we have discussed only the first type of loci, and found that the identification of such genomic regions is a formidable problem. Replication between seemingly similar data sets is weak, likely reflecting the older age of onset associated with the disease, the inability to collect affected individuals from more than two generations in a family, and the variation seen in disease presentation, in addition to the underlying locus heterogeneity. Indeed, the definition of PC is ever changing, as diagnostic criteria and tools for pinpointing early lesions improve. Are we making progress? Clearly the answer is yes. The ability to divide large data sets into homogenous subset of families likely to share common genetic under-pinnings has improved power to identify loci and reproducibility between loci is now more common. Indeed, several groups report linkage to loci on chromosomes 1, 17, 19, and 22. Key to our continued success is our ever increasing ability to understand the disease. Identifying the subset of men who are likely to get clinically significant disease is the goal of genetic studies like these, and identifying the underlying loci is the key for developing diagnostics. The willingness of the community to work together has been an important factor in the successes the community has enjoyed to date, and will likely be as important as we move forward to untangle the genetics of this complex and common disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.