Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18496839›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular recognition : JMR

Thermodynamics of T-cell receptor-peptide/MHC interactions: progress and opportunities.

Kathryn M Armstrong, Francis K Insaidoo, Brian M Baker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular recognition : JMR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. T-cell virtuosity in ''knowing thyself".Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  5. The Energetic Landscape of Catch Bonds in TCR Interfaces.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Structurally silent peptide anchor modifications allosterically modulate T cell recognition in a receptor-dependent manner.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn M ArmstrongDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, 251 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Francis K Insaidoo
Brian M Baker
University of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Chemistry-Biochemistry-Biology Training Program at Notre DameT32GM075762 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI CHANG, MAYLAND F, MOBASHERY, SHAHRIAR · 2007 to 2021
$3.7M
Physical Basis for T Cell Receptor Binding and ActivityR01GM067079 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BAKER, BRIAN M · 2003 to 2015
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067079NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM067079NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM075762NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM075762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

alphabeta T-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize peptide antigens presented by class I or class II major histocompatibility complex molecules (pMHC). Here we review the use of thermodynamic measurements in the study of TCR-pMHC interactions, with attention to the diversity in binding thermodynamics and how this is related to the variation in TCR-pMHC interfaces. We show that there is no enthalpic or entropic signature for TCR binding; rather, enthalpy and entropy changes vary in a compensatory manner that reflects a narrow free energy window for the interactions that have been characterized. Binding enthalpy and entropy changes do not correlate with structural features such as buried surface area or the number of hydrogen bonds within TCR-pMHC interfaces, possibly reflecting the myriad of contributors to binding thermodynamics, but likely also reflecting a reliance on van't Hoff over calorimetric measurements and the unaccounted influence of equilibria linked to binding. TCR-pMHC binding heat capacity changes likewise vary considerably. In some cases, the heat capacity changes are consistent with conformational differences between bound and free receptors, but there is little data indicating these conformational differences represent the need to organize disordered CDR loops. In this regard, we discuss how thermodynamics may provide additional insight into conformational changes occurring upon TCR binding. Finally, we highlight opportunities for the further use of thermodynamic measurements in the study of TCR-pMHC interactions, not only for understanding TCR binding in general, but also for understanding specifics of individual interactions and the engineering of TCRs with desired molecular recognition properties.

Indexed as

AnimalsHistocompatibility AntigensHumansMiceModels, MolecularMultiprotein ComplexesPeptidesProtein BindingReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaThermodynamicsHistocompatibility AntigensMultiprotein ComplexesPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta

Identifiers

PMID18496839
PMCPMC3674762
OpenAlexW2162959818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.