Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18496705›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2008

Structure and dynamics of retrotransposons at wheat centromeres and pericentromeres.

Zhao Liu, Wei Yue, Dayong Li, Richard R-C Wang, Xiuying Kong, Kun Lu, Guixiang Wang, Yushen Dong, Weiwei Jin, Xueyong Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Establishment of a set of wheat-rye addition lines with resistance to stem rust.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The Genomics of Plant Satellite DNA.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2021
    Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhao LiuKey Laboratory of Crop Germplasm & Biotechnology, MOA, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, The National Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081, People's Republic of China.
Wei Yue
Dayong Li
Richard R-C Wang
Xiuying Kong
Kun Lu
Guixiang Wang
Yushen Dong
Weiwei Jin
Xueyong Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known of the dynamics of centromeric DNA in polyploid plants. We report the sequences of two centromere-associated bacterial artificial chromosome clones from a Triticum boeoticum library. Both autonomous and non-autonomous wheat centromeric retrotransposons (CRWs) were identified, both being closely associated with the centromeres of wheat. Fiber-fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed that wheat centromeric retrotransposons (CRWs) represent a dominant component of the wheat centromere and are associated with centromere function. CRW copy number showed variation among different genomes: the D genome chromosomes contained fewer copies than either the A or B genome chromosomes. The frequency of lengthy continuous CRW arrays was higher than that in either rice or maize. The dynamics of CRWs and other retrotransposons at centromeric and pericentromeric regions during diploid speciation and polyploidization of wheat and its related species are discussed.

Indexed as

CentromereChromatinChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, PlantGenes, PlantOryzaRetroelementsTriticumZea maysChromatinRetroelements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.