Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18496134›Full record

ArticlePharmacogenetics and genomics2008

Identification of genetic variants and gene expression relationships associated with pharmacogenes in humans.

Rong Stephanie Huang, Shiwei Duan, Emily O Kistner, Wei Zhang, Wasim K Bleibel, Nancy J Cox, M Eileen Dolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacogenetics and genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative description of haplotype structure and genetic diversity of MDR1 (ABCB1) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative populations.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2010
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Population-specific GSTM1 copy number variation.Human molecular genetics · 2009
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rong Stephanie HuangSection of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Shiwei Duan
Emily O Kistner
Wei Zhang
Wasim K Bleibel
Nancy J Cox
M Eileen Dolan

Funding

Whole GenomeU01GM061393 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI RATAIN, MARK J · 2000 to 2014
$39.0M
THE STANFORD PHARMACOGENETICS KNOWLEDGE BASEU01GM061374 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2000 to 2009
$24.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061374NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061393NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM61374NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM61393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe very important pharmacogenes (VIPs) were selected by Pharmacogenetic Research Network (National Institutes of Health-PGRN) owing to their significant effects on drug treatment both at the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic levels. Our objective was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that potentially affected the expression of these genes or potential SNP-gene interactions involved to improve our understanding of genetic effects on drug therapy. BASIC

methodsGene expression was evaluated in 176 International HapMap lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from CEU (CEPH, Utah residents with ancestry from northern and western Europe; n=87) and YRI (Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria; n=89) using Affymetrix GeneChip Human Exon 1.0 ST arrays (Affymetrix Laboratory, Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, California, USA) with interrogation of greater than 17,000 human genes. Genome-wide association was performed between over two million publicly available HapMap SNPs and gene expression. MAIN

resultsThe expression of two PGRN-VIPs (GSTT1 and GSTM1) are significantly associated with SNPs within 2.5 Mb of the genes; whereas the expression of three and ten PGRN-VIPs are significantly associated with distant-acting SNPs in CEU and YRI, respectively. In addition, three and four PGRN-VIPs harbor SNPs that are distantly associated with other gene expressions in CEU and YRI, respectively. PRINCIPAL

conclusionUsing this information, one may identify genetic variants that are significantly associated with the expression of any set of genes of interest; or evaluate potential gene-gene interaction through SNP expression relationships.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGenetic VariationPharmacogeneticsBlack PeopleCell LineGlutathione TransferaseHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhite Peopleglutathione S-transferase T1Glutathione Transferase

Identifiers

PMID18496134
PMCPMC2567052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.