Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18495919›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Entropic contributions and the influence of the hydrophobic environment in promiscuous protein-protein association.

Chia-En A Chang, William A McLaughlin, Riccardo Baron, Wei Wang, J Andrew McCammon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A universal entropy-driven mechanism for thioredoxin-target recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chia-En A ChangDepartments of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Center for Theoretical Biological Physics Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0365, USA.
William A McLaughlin
Riccardo Baron
Wei Wang
J Andrew McCammon

Funding

HEMOGLOBIN AND BLOOD PROTEIN CHEMISTRYT32DK007233 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KOMIVES, ELIZABETH A. · 1986 to 2012
$4.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDDK NIH HHS 5 T32DK07233NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms by which a promiscuous protein can strongly interact with several different proteins using the same binding interface are not completely understood. An example is protein kinase A (PKA), which uses a single face on its docking/dimerization domain to interact with multiple A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAP) that localize it to different parts of the cell. In the current study, the configurational entropy contributions to the binding between the AKAP protein HT31 with the D/D domain of RII alpha-regulatory subunit of PKA were examined. The results show that the majority of configurational entropy loss for the interaction was due to decreased fluctuations within rotamer states of the side chains. The result is in contrast to the widely held approximation that the decrease in the number of rotamer states available to the side chains forms the major component. Further analysis showed that there was a direct linear relationship between total configurational entropy and the number of favorable, alternative contacts available within hydrophobic environments. The hydrophobic binding pocket of the D/D domain provides alternative contact points for the side chains of AKAP peptides that allow them to adopt different binding conformations. The increase in binding conformations provides an increase in binding entropy and hence binding affinity. We infer that a general strategy for a promiscuous protein is to provide alternative contact points at its interface to increase binding affinity while the plasticity required for binding to multiple partners is retained. Implications are discussed for understanding and treating diseases in which promiscuous protein interactions are used.

Indexed as

EntropyA Kinase Anchor ProteinsCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase RIIalpha SubunitHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsPeptidesProtein ConformationA Kinase Anchor ProteinsCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase RIIalpha SubunitPeptides

Identifiers

PMID18495919
PMCPMC2391134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.