Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18495454›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2008

The life cycle of the metazoan nuclear envelope.

Daniel J Anderson, Martin W Hetzer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Organelle Communication with the Nucleus.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Sealing holes in cellular membranes.The EMBO journal · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The nuclear envelope.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2010
    Review
  16. Nuclear pore complexes: guardians of the nuclear genome.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel J AndersonSalk Institute for Biological Studies, Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Martin W Hetzer
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Nuclear Membrane Fusion in Xenopus Egg ExtractsR01GM073994 · NIGMS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI HETZER, MARTIN W · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear envelope is a double-layered membrane that encloses the nuclear genome and transcriptional machinery. In dividing cells of metazoa, the nucleus completely disassembles during mitosis, creating the need to re-establish the nuclear compartment at the end of each cell division. Given the crucial role of the nuclear envelope in gene regulation and cellular organization, it is not surprising that its biogenesis and organization have become active research areas. We will review recent insights into nuclear membrane dynamics during the cell cycle.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleLife Cycle StagesNuclear EnvelopeVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID18495454
PMCPMC2676173
OpenAlexW2040136070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.