Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18494955›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2008

The patient movement as an emancipation movement.

Charlotte Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The emancipation of patients: a theory whose time has come.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Care planning for long-term conditions – a concept mapping.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient-expert partnerships in research: how to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Charlotte WilliamsonBoard of Trustees, Picker Institute Europe, Oxford OX1 1RX, UK. charlotte@wmsn.freeserve.co.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo suggest that the patient movement is an emancipation movement.

backgroundThe patient movement is young and fragmented; and it can seem confusing because it lacks an explicit ideology with intellectual and theoretical underpinnings.

methodsDrawing mainly on the experiences and the published writings of patient activists, the author identified eight aspects of the patient movement that could be compared with aspects of recognized emancipation movements: the radicalization of activists; the creation of new knowledge; the identification of guiding principles; the sense of direction; the unmasking of new issues; schisms within the movement and allies outside it; and the gradual social acceptance of some of the ideas (here standards of health care) that activists work to promote.

resultsSimilarities between certain aspects of the patient movement and of the recognized emancipation movements were close.

conclusionThe patient movement can be regarded as an emancipation movement, albeit an immature one.

Indexed as

CoercionPatient AdvocacyPatient RightsPersonal AutonomySocial ChangeDecision MakingHealth PolicyHumansPhysician-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID18494955
PMCPMC5060437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.