Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18494814›Full record

ReviewDifferentiation; research in biological diversity2008

Gene targeting to the stroma of the prostate and bone.

Roger S Jackson, Omar E Franco, Neil A Bhowmick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Differentiation; research in biological diversity, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roger S JacksonDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2765, USA.
Omar E Franco
Neil A Bhowmick
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Protein Collection and Proteomics Integrative Shared ResourceU54CA126505 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MATRISIAN, LYNN M · 2006 to 2010
$8.2M
TGFB Signals in Prostate Stromal-Epithelial InteractionsR01CA108646 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BHOWMICK, NEIL A. · 2004 to 2016
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA108646NCI NIH HHS CA126505NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108646NCI NIH HHS U54 CA126505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stromal-epithelial interactions mediated by paracrine signaling mechanisms dictate prostate development and progression of prostate cancer. The regulatory role of androgens in both the prostate stromal and epithelial compartments set the prostate apart from many other organs and tissues with regard to gene targeting. The identification of androgen-dependent prostate epithelial promoters has allowed successful gene targeting to the prostate epithelial compartment. Currently, there are no transgenic mouse models available to specifically alter gene expression within the prostate stromal compartment. As a primary metastatic site for prostate cancer is bone, the functional dissection of the bone stromal compartment is important for understanding stromal-epithelial interactions associated with metastatic tumor growth. Use of currently available methodologies for the expression or deletion of gene expression in recent research studies has advanced our understanding of the stroma. However, the complexity of stromal heterogeneity within the prostate remains a challenge to obtaining compartment or cell-lineage-specific in vivo models necessary for furthering our understanding of prostatic developmental, benign, tumorigenic, and metastatic growth.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesGene TargetingAnimalsHumansMaleMiceMice, KnockoutProstateProstatic NeoplasmsStromal Cells

Identifiers

PMID18494814
PMCPMC4041590
OpenAlexW2033498930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.