Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18493070›Full record

ArticleGenetics2008

Impact of amplified fragment length polymorphism size homoplasy on the estimation of population genetic diversity and the detection of selective loci.

Armando Caballero, Humberto Quesada, Emilio Rolán-Alvarez

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lack of gene flow betweenEvolutionary applications · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. TallPeerJ · 2020
    Article
  8. Landscape genetic structure ofEcology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Methylation divergence of invasiveEcology and evolution · 2018
    Article
  11. AFLP reveals low genetic diversity of the bryozoanJournal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. IdentifyingFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Armando CaballeroDepartamento de Bioquímica, Genética, e Inmunología, Facultad de Biología, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain. armando@uvigo.es
Humberto Quesada
Emilio Rolán-Alvarez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AFLP markers are becoming one of the most popular tools for genetic analysis in the fields of evolutionary genetics and ecology and conservation of genetic resources. The technique combines a high-information content and fidelity with the possibility of carrying out genomewide scans. However, a potential problem with this technique is the lack of homology of bands with the same electrophoretic mobility, what is known as fragment-size homoplasy. We carried out a theoretical analysis aimed at quantifying the impact of AFLP homoplasy on the estimation of within- and between-neutral population genetic diversity in a model of a structured finite population with migration among subpopulations. We also investigated the performance of a currently used method (DFDIST software) to detect selective loci from the comparison between genetic differentiation and heterozygosis of dominant molecular markers, as well as the impact of AFLP homoplasy on its effectiveness. The results indicate that the biases produced by homoplasy are: (1) an overestimation of the frequency of the allele determining the presence of the band, (2) an underestimation of the degree of differentiation between subpopulations, and (3) an overestimation or underestimation of the heterozygosis, depending on the allele frequency of the markers. The impact of homoplasy is quickly diminished by reducing the number of fragments analyzed per primer combination. However, substantial biases on the expected heterozygosity (up to 15-25%) may occur with approximately 50-100 fragments per primer combination. The performance of the DFDIST software to detect selective loci from dominant markers is highly dependent on the number of selective loci in the genome and their average effects, the estimate of genetic differentiation chosen to be used in the analysis, and the critical bound probability used to detect outliers. Overall, the results indicate that the software should be used with caution. AFLP homoplasy can produce a reduction of up to 15% in the power to detect selective loci.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenetic VariationSelection, GeneticAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisComputer SimulationGene FrequencyPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length

Identifiers

PMID18493070
PMCPMC2390631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.