Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18493068›Full record

ArticleGenetics2008

The effect of chromosome geometry on genetic diversity.

Pradeep Reddy Marri, Leigh K Harris, Kathryn Houmiel, Steven C Slater, Howard Ochman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pradeep Reddy MarriDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. pradeepm@email.arizona.edu
Leigh K Harris
Kathryn Houmiel
Steven C Slater
Howard Ochman

Funding

Genome Erosion in Infectious MicroorganismsR01GM056120 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OCHMAN, HOWARD · 1997 to 2007
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM56120NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although organisms with linear chromosomes must solve the problem of fully replicating their chromosome ends, this chromosome configuration has emerged repeatedly during bacterial evolution and is evident in three divergent bacterial phyla. The benefit usually ascribed to this topology is the ability to boost genetic variation through increased recombination. But because numerous processes can impact linkage disequilibrium, such an effect is difficult to assess by comparing across bacterial taxa that possess different chromosome topologies. To test directly the contribution of chromosome architecture to genetic diversity and recombination, we examined sequence variation in strains of Agrobacterium Biovar 1, which are unique among sequenced bacteria in having both a circular and a linear chromosome. Whereas the allelic diversity among strains is generated principally by mutations, intragenic recombination is higher within genes situated on the circular chromosome. In contrast, recombination between genes is, on average, higher on the linear chromosome, but it occurs at the same rate as that observed between genes mapping to the distal portion of the circular chromosome. Collectively, our findings indicate that chromosome topology does not contribute significantly to either allelic or genotypic diversity and that the evolution of linear chromosomes is not based on a facility to recombine.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPhylogenyAgrobacterium tumefaciensBase SequenceChromosome MappingChromosomes, BacterialCluster AnalysisLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNASpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID18493068
PMCPMC2390628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.