Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18491149›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2008

[New substances and applications for postoperative pain therapy].

E M Pogatzki-Zahn, P K Zahn

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Retarded opioids in perioperative pain therapy].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2009
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E M Pogatzki-ZahnKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, 48149 Münster. pogatzki@anit.uni-muenster.de
P K Zahn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The onset of postoperative pain is the result of various pathophysiological mechanisms and depends on the type of surgery performed. Therefore, any adequate postoperative pain treatment requires multimodal and procedure-specific analgesia. In addition to reducing perioperative complications and improving patient comfort, optimal postoperative pain management also represents an important quality characteristic which can influence the patient in their choice of hospital. In the past 1-2 years, known groups of substances have been rediscovered for postoperative pain therapy (e.g., Gabapentin and Pregabalin, i.v. Lidocaine, Ketamine or glucocorticoids), while new substances (coxibe, oral oxycodone+naloxone) and applications have been developed. The present overview article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these substances and analgesic methods, as well as their specific areas of application.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAdrenal Cortex HormonesAlgorithmsAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnticonvulsantsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCombined Modality TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineFentanylHumansLidocainePostoperative PainReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnticonvulsantsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFentanylLidocaineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.