Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18490949›Full record

ArticleStudies in mycology2007

Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus section Usti.

J Houbraken, M Due, J Varga, M Meijer, J C Frisvad, R A Samson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in mycology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Asperinsuterpenes A-C from the FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Accelerating the understanding ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Studies in mycology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Four UnrecordedMycobiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Clinical Relevance and Characteristics ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Classification ofStudies in mycology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J HoubrakenCBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, PO Box 85167, NL-3508 AD Utrecht, the Netherlands.
M Due
J Varga
M Meijer
J C Frisvad
R A Samson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aspergillus ustus is a very common species in foods, soil and indoor environments. Based on chemical, molecular and morphological data, A. insuetus is separated from A. ustus and revived. A. insuetus differs from A. ustus in producing drimans and ophiobolin G and H and not producing ustic acid and austocystins. The molecular, physiological and morphological data also indicated that another species, A. keveiisp. nov. is closely related but distinct from A. insuetus. Aspergillus section Usti sensu stricto includes 8 species: A. ustus, A. puniceus, A. granulosus, A. pseudodeflectus, A. calidoustus, A. insuetus and A. keveii together with Emericella heterothallica.

Indexed as

actinAspergilluscalmodulinextrolite profilesITSphylogeneticspolyphasic taxonomy.β-tubulin

Identifiers

PMID18490949
PMCPMC2275196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.