Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18488243›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2009

Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasolacrimal duct.

Hiroshi Sakaida, Masayoshi Kobayashi, Atsushi Yuta, Yoshinori Imanishi, Yuichi Majima

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroshi SakaidaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan. hsakaida@clin.medic.mie-u.ac.jp
Masayoshi Kobayashi
Atsushi Yuta
Yoshinori Imanishi
Yuichi Majima
Mie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumors originating from the nasolacrimal duct are exceedingly rare. Only a few cases have been reported previously. In advanced cases with extended tumor, differential diagnosis from lacrimal sac tumor is difficult. A 68-year-old Japanese man with intractable dacryocystitis was examined with intranasal endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Squamous cell carcinoma extended from a medial site in the left orbit to the lacrimal orifice. En bloc resection was performed and histopathological examination of the surgical specimen using serial section suggested that the origin of the tumor was located in the nasolacrimal duct. This is the first case in nasolacrimal duct carcinoma whose differential diagnosis of origin has been studied in detail. We showed that pathological study using serial section along the duct provides useful information for diagnosing the tumor origin in addition to that obtained from imaging studies.

Indexed as

AgedBiopsyCarcinoma, Squamous CellDacryocystitisDiagnosis, DifferentialEye NeoplasmsFatal OutcomeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNasolacrimal DuctNeoplasm StagingTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID18488243
OpenAlexW2012957546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.