Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18487259›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2008

Fine expression profiling of full-length transcripts using a size-unbiased cDNA library prepared with the vector-capping method.

Mio Oshikawa, Yoshiko Sugai, Ron Usami, Kuniyo Ohtoko, Shigeru Toyama, Seishi Kato

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mio OshikawaDepartment of Rehabilitation Engineering, Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, 4-1 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-8555, Japan.
Yoshiko Sugai
Ron Usami
Kuniyo Ohtoko
Shigeru Toyama
Seishi Kato

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, we have developed a vector-capping method for constructing a full-length cDNA library. In the present study, we performed in-depth analysis of the vector-capped cDNA library prepared from a single type of cell. As a result of single-pass sequencing analysis of 24,000 clones randomly isolated from the unamplified library, we identified 19,951 full-length cDNA clones whose intactness was confirmed by the presence of an additional G at their 5' end. The full-length cDNA content was >95%. Mapping these sequences to the human genome, we identified 4,513 transcriptional units that include 36 antisense transcripts against known genes. Comparison of the frequencies of abundant clones showed that the expression profiles of different libraries, including the distribution of transcriptional start sites (TSSs), were reproducible. The analysis of long-sized cDNAs showed that this library contained many cDNAs with a long-sized insert up to 11,199 bp of golgin B, including multiple slicing variants for filamin A and filamin B. These results suggest that the size-unbiased full-length cDNA library constructed using the vector-capping method will be an ideal resource for fine expression profiling of transcriptional variants with alternative TSSs and alternative splicing.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryGenetic VectorsCells, CulturedChromosome MappingCloning, MolecularDatabases, Nucleic AcidGene DosageGene Expression ProfilingHumansReproducibility of ResultsRNA CapsRNA, MessengerTranscription Initiation SiteRNA CapsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID18487259
PMCPMC2650634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.