ArticleAcademic radiology2008
Integrated CT/bronchoscopy in the central airways: preliminary results.
Article in Academic radiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-material three dimensional printed models for simulation of bronchoscopy.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- Robust bronchoscope motion tracking using sequential Monte Carlo methods in navigated bronchoscopy: dynamic phantom and patient validation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2012Article
- Recent technological and application developments in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for improved pulmonary nodule detection and lung cancer staging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2010Review
- New imaging approaches for understanding lung cancer response to treatment.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2008Article
- The porcine lung as a potential model for cystic fibrosis.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesMany imaging modalities and methodologies exist for evaluating the pulmonary airways. Individually, each modality provides insight to the state of the airways; however, alone they do not necessarily provide a comprehensive description. The goal of this work is to integrate complementary medical imaging datasets to form a synergistic description of the airways. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo digital bronchoscopic techniques were used to evaluate the pulmonary mucosa. A digital color bronchoscopic system was used to detect mucosal color alterations, and a fluorescence detection system was used to assess the microvasculature of the bronchial mucosa. Study participants were also imaged with a multidetector row computed tomographic (MDCT) scanner. Virtual bronchoscopic and image registration techniques were exploited to combine three-dimensional surface renderings, extracted from the MDCT data, together with the two-dimensional digital bronchoscopic images. Validation of the fusion process was performed on a rubber phantom of an adult airway with 4 embedded metal beads.
resultsThe fusion of the MDCT extracted airway tree and the digital bronchoscopic datasets were presented for three study participants. In addition, the detected accuracy of the registration method to reliably align the MDCT and bronchoscopic image datasets was determined to be 1.98 mm in the phantom airway model.
conclusionWe have demonstrated that merging of three distinct digital datasets to provide a single synergistic description of the airways is possible. This is a pilot project in the field of eidomics, the process of combining digital image datasets and image-based processes together. We anticipate that in the future eidomics will provide a universal and predictive imaging language that will change health care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.