Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18485820›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pharmacology2008

siRNA and the lung: research tool or therapeutic drug?

Antonin de Fougerolles, Tatiana Novobrantseva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. siRNA delivery to the lung: what's new?Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2014
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Polymers in small-interfering RNA delivery.Nucleic acid therapeutics · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antonin de FougerollesAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, 300 Third Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States. tdefougerolles@alnylam.com
Tatiana Novobrantseva

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oligonucleotide-based therapeutics have been hailed as 'the next great wave of the biotechnology revolution' starting with antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) nearly 20 years ago to RNA interference (RNAi) currently. Is RNAi just the latest research tool or does it have real potential as a therapeutic drug modality? As a research tool, it is evident that RNAi has revolutionized the biological sciences by allowing selective silencing of messenger RNA (mRNA) expression. With the advent of the postgenomic era, RNAi offers a therapeutic platform on which to identify potential picomolar active drug candidates to any target, including those that are conventionally undruggable. In this review, we will discuss the progress made in developing RNAi therapeutics for the treatment of respiratory diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansInfluenza, HumanPharmaceutical VehiclesRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory Tract DiseasesRNA, Small InterferingPharmaceutical VehiclesRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID18485820
PMCPMC7106383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.