Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18485363›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2008

Spontaneous access to DNA target sites in folded chromatin fibers.

Michael G Poirier, Malte Bussiek, Jörg Langowski, Jonathan Widom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ISWI catalyzes nucleosome sliding in condensed nucleosome arrays.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  10. scATAcat: cell-type annotation for scATAC-seq data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. ISWI catalyzes nucleosome sliding in condensed nucleosome arrays.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael G PoirierDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Cell Biology, Northwestern University, 2205 Tech Drive, Evanston, IL 60208-3500, USA.
Malte Bussiek
Jörg Langowski
Jonathan Widom

Funding

NUCLEOSOME POSITIONINGR01GM058617 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI UHLENBECK, OLKE C · 1999 to 2012
$4.4M
MECHANISTIC PROBLEMS IN EUKARYOTIC GENE REGULATIONR01GM054692 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI UHLENBECK, OLKE C · 1997 to 2011
$3.0M
Nucleosome site exposure within oligonucleosomesF32GM072306 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI POIRIER, MICHAEL GUY · 2004 to 2005
$54k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM072306NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054692NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058617NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM54692NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM58617Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA wrapped in nucleosomes is sterically occluded from many protein complexes that must act on it; how such complexes gain access to nucleosomal DNA is not known. In vitro studies on isolated nucleosomes show that they undergo spontaneous partial unwrapping conformational transitions, which make the wrapped nucleosomal DNA transiently accessible. Thus, site exposure might provide a general mechanism allowing access of protein complexes to nucleosomal DNA. However, existing quantitative analyses of site exposure focused on single nucleosomes, while the presence of neighbor nucleosomes and concomitant chromatin folding might significantly influence site exposure. In this work, we carried out quantitative studies on the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA in homogeneous nucleosome arrays. Two striking findings emerged. Organization into chromatin fibers changes the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA only modestly, from approximately 3-fold decreases to approximately 8-fold increases in accessibility. This means that nucleosome arrays are intrinsically dynamic and accessible even when they are visibly condensed. In contrast, chromatin folding decreases the accessibility of linker DNA by as much as approximately 50-fold. Thus, nucleosome positioning dramatically influences the accessibility of target sites located inside nucleosomes, while chromatin folding dramatically regulates access to target sites in linker DNA.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesChickensChromatinDNADNA PrimersDNA Restriction EnzymesHistonesIn Vitro TechniquesKineticsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceNucleosomesProtein FoldingProtein Structure, QuaternaryChromatinDNADNA PrimersDNA Restriction EnzymesHistonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID18485363
PMCPMC2481406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.