Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18485344›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2008

Three genes control the timing, the site and the size of blastema formation in Drosophila.

Kimberly D McClure, Anne Sustar, Gerold Schubiger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Imaginal Disc Regeneration: Something Old, Something New.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Regeneration Genetics.Annual review of genetics · 2017
    Review
  15. Imaginal disc regeneration takes flight.Current opinion in cell biology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Advances in wound care · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly D McClureUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Anatomy, 1550 4th Street, Rock Hall, Mail Code 2822, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. kimberly.mcclure@ucsf.edu
Anne Sustar
Gerold Schubiger
University of Washington · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGYT32HD007183 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2015
$5.7M
Regeneration of Imaginal Discs in DrosophilaR01GM058282 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRADSHAW, H.D. TOBY · 1998 to 2010
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007183NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration is a vital process to maintain and repair tissues. Despite the importance of regeneration, the genes responsible for regenerative growth remain largely unknown. In Drosophila, imaginal disc regeneration can be induced either by fragmentation and in vivo culture or in situ by ubiquitous expression of wingless (wg/wnt1). Imaginal discs, like appendages in lower vertebrates, initiate regeneration by wound healing and proliferation at the wound site, forming a regeneration blastema. Most blastema cells maintain their disc-specific identity during regeneration; a few cells however, exhibit stem-cell like properties and switch to a different fate, in a phenomenon known as transdetermination. We identified three genes, regeneration (rgn), augmenter of liver regeneration (alr) and Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (Mmp1) expressed specifically in blastema cells during disc regeneration. Mutations in these genes affect both fragmentation- and wg-induced regeneration by either delaying, reducing or positioning the regeneration blastema. In addition to the modifications of blastema homeostasis, mutations in the three genes alter the rate of regeneration-induced transdetermination. We propose that these genes function in regenerative proliferation, growth and regulate cellular plasticity.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell DifferentiationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsHumansMatrix Metalloproteinase 1Molecular Sequence DataOxidoreductasesOxidoreductases Acting on Sulfur Group DonorsRegenerationSequence AlignmentDrosophila ProteinsMatrix Metalloproteinase 1OxidoreductasesOxidoreductases Acting on Sulfur Group DonorsRgn protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID18485344
PMCPMC2483308
OpenAlexW2048106438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.