ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Aspects of coverage in medical DNA sequencing.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Reconstruction of tumor clonal haplotypes based on an improved spanning algorithm].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2019Article
- Stepwise large genome assembly approach: a case of Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb).BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Fast imputation using medium or low-coverage sequence data.BMC genetics · 2015Article
- Effect of Next-Generation Exome Sequencing Depth for Discovery of Diagnostic Variants.Genomics & informatics · 2015Article
- Expanding the computational toolbox for mining cancer genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2014Review
- Coverage theories for metagenomic DNA sequencing based on a generalization of Stevens' theorem.Journal of mathematical biology · 2013Article
- Advances for studying clonal evolution in cancer.Cancer letters · 2013Review
- Massively parallel sequencing of the mouse exome to accurately identify rare, induced mutations: an immediate source for thousands of new mouse models.Open biology · 2012Article
- Genotype calling from next-generation sequencing data using haplotype information of reads.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Combining SNP discovery from next-generation sequencing data with bulked segregant analysis (BSA) to fine-map genes in polyploid wheat.BMC plant biology · 2012Article
- Efficient study design for next generation sequencing.Genetic epidemiology · 2011Article
- Linkage disequilibrium based genotype calling from low-coverage shotgun sequencing reads.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Article
- Occupancy modeling, maximum contig size probabilities and designing metagenomics experiments.PloS one · 2010Article
- Quantifying the relative amount of mouse and human DNA in cancer xenografts using species-specific variation in gene length.BioTechniques · 2010Article
- The theory of discovering rare variants via DNA sequencing.BMC genomics · 2009Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNA sequencing is now emerging as an important component in biomedical studies of diseases like cancer. Short-read, highly parallel sequencing instruments are expected to be used heavily for such projects, but many design specifications have yet to be conclusively established. Perhaps the most fundamental of these is the redundancy required to detect sequence variations, which bears directly upon genomic coverage and the consequent resolving power for discerning somatic mutations.
resultsWe address the medical sequencing coverage problem via an extension of the standard mathematical theory of haploid coverage. The expected diploid multi-fold coverage, as well as its generalization for aneuploidy are derived and these expressions can be readily evaluated for any project. The resulting theory is used as a scaling law to calibrate performance to that of standard BAC sequencing at 8x to 10x redundancy, i.e. for expected coverages that exceed 99% of the unique sequence. A differential strategy is formalized for tumor/normal studies wherein tumor samples are sequenced more deeply than normal ones. In particular, both tumor alleles should be detected at least twice, while both normal alleles are detected at least once. Our theory predicts these requirements can be met for tumor and normal redundancies of approximately 26x and 21x, respectively. We explain why these values do not differ by a factor of 2, as might intuitively be expected. Future technology developments should prompt even deeper sequencing of tumors, but the 21x value for normal samples is essentially a constant.
conclusionGiven the assumptions of standard coverage theory, our model gives pragmatic estimates for required redundancy. The differential strategy should be an efficient means of identifying potential somatic mutations for further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.