Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18483752›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2009

Unmet needs in cancer patients: development of a supportive needs screening tool (SNST).

Cathie Pigott, Annabel Pollard, Kathryn Thomson, Sanchia Aranda

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. African American Patients' Psychosocial Support Needs and Barriers to Treatment: Patient Needs Assessment.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  8. Feasibility of a quality improvement strategy integrating psychosocial care into 28 medical cancer centers (HuCare project).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding the needs of colorectal cancer patients during the pre-diagnosis phase.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2013
    Article
  11. Unmet psychosocial needs among cancer patients undergoing ambulatory care in Singapore.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  12. Intrusion and avoidance in subjects undergoing genetic investigation and counseling for hereditary cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cathie PigottSupportive Care Research Group, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 8006, Australia. Cathie.Pigott@petermac.org
Annabel Pollard
Kathryn Thomson
Sanchia Aranda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goals of workA diagnosis of cancer can have a profound impact on the physical, emotional, psychological, social and spiritual areas of a person's life. Supportive care services are directed towards this full range of issues associated with cancer. Identification of need is the first step in meeting supportive care concerns, but there is a lack of tools and processes regularly used in clinical practice. This article reports the first steps in the development of a supportive needs screening tool appropriate for use in an oncology outpatient setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsA review of the literature was undertaken, and a draft tool developed using a process of item reduction. A small pre-test followed by a pilot test with 87 patients attending Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne Australia was undertaken. Evaluation to identify usability and acceptability in clinical practice included descriptive statistics to profile patient needs and referrals generated by the supportive needs screening tool (SNST), interviews with a small sample of participants and surveys completed by staff. MAIN

resultsThe SNST was developed with 41 questions, the majority requiring a yes/no response. From the tool, a total of 1,085 needs were identified (mean = 12 needs/patient). A total of 264 referrals were generated, with 72% of patients receiving at least one referral. Patients and staff reported high acceptability.

conclusionsThe SNST has face validity and demonstrated usability in an ambulatory care oncology stetting, as first steps in instrument development. Further testing of reliability and validity are being undertaken.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentNeoplasmsPilot ProjectsReferral and ConsultationVictoria

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.