ArticlePLoS computational biology2008
A comparative computer simulation of dendritic morphology.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- A biologically inspired repair mechanism for neuronal reconstructions with a focus on human dendrites.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Local Microtubule and F-Actin Distributions Fully Constrain the Spatial Geometry ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Prediction of Neural Diameter From Morphology to Enable Accurate Simulation.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- Modeling of Astrocyte Networks: Toward Realistic Topology and Dynamics.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Achieving functional neuronal dendrite structure through sequential stochastic growth and retraction.eLife · 2020Article
- Spatially resolved dendritic integration: towards a functional classification of neurons.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Automated Neuron Reconstruction from 3D Fluorescence Microscopy Images Using Sequential Monte Carlo Estimation.Neuroinformatics · 2019Article
- Theoretical Models of Neural Development.iScience · 2018Review
- Modelling brain-wide neuronal morphology via rooted Cayley trees.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Stochastic Modeling of Radiation-induced Dendritic Damage on in silico Mouse Hippocampal Neurons.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Morphological determinants of dendritic arborization neurons in Drosophila larva.Brain structure & function · 2018Article
- Fuzzy-Logic Based Detection and Characterization of Junctions and Terminations in Fluorescence Microscopy Images of Neurons.Neuroinformatics · 2016Article
- A general homeostatic principle following lesion induced dendritic remodeling.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2016Article
- Neuron Image Analyzer: Automated and Accurate Extraction of Neuronal Data from Low Quality Images.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Topological characterization of neuronal arbor morphology via sequence representation: I--motif analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Dendrodendritic synapses in the mouse olfactory bulb external plexiform layer.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2015Article
- 3D-printer visualization of neuron models.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2015Article
- Distributed organization of a brain microcircuit analyzed by three-dimensional modeling: the olfactory bulb.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
- Statistical analysis and data mining of digital reconstructions of dendritic morphologies.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational modeling of neuronal morphology is a powerful tool for understanding developmental processes and structure-function relationships. We present a multifaceted approach based on stochastic sampling of morphological measures from digital reconstructions of real cells. We examined how dendritic elongation, branching, and taper are controlled by three morphometric determinants: Branch Order, Radius, and Path Distance from the soma. Virtual dendrites were simulated starting from 3,715 neuronal trees reconstructed in 16 different laboratories, including morphological classes as diverse as spinal motoneurons and dentate granule cells. Several emergent morphometrics were used to compare real and virtual trees. Relating model parameters to Branch Order best constrained the number of terminations for most morphological classes, except pyramidal cell apical trees, which were better described by a dependence on Path Distance. In contrast, bifurcation asymmetry was best constrained by Radius for apical, but Path Distance for basal trees. All determinants showed similar performance in capturing total surface area, while surface area asymmetry was best determined by Path Distance. Grouping by other characteristics, such as size, asymmetry, arborizations, or animal species, showed smaller differences than observed between apical and basal, pointing to the biological importance of this separation. Hybrid models using combinations of the determinants confirmed these trends and allowed a detailed characterization of morphological relations. The differential findings between morphological groups suggest different underlying developmental mechanisms. By comparing the effects of several morphometric determinants on the simulation of different neuronal classes, this approach sheds light on possible growth mechanism variations responsible for the observed neuronal diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.