Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18483176›Full record

ArticleMolecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)2008

Sex-specific early growth hormone response genes in rat liver.

Valerie Wauthier, David J Waxman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The relationship between gender and pharmacology.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Regulation of gene expression by growth hormone.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Establishment and analysis of a mouse model that regulates sex-related differences in liver drug metabolism.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valerie WauthierDepartment of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
David J Waxman
Boston University · US

Funding

Regulation of Sex Differences in Liver MetabolismR01DK033765 · NIDDK · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI WAXMAN, DAVID J · 1986 to 2017
$8.7M
Regulation of sex differences in liver metabolismR56DK033765 · NIDDK · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI WAXMAN, DAVID J · 2018 to 2018
$206k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK33765NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK033765NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK033765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary GH-secretory profiles are sex dependent and regulate the sexually dimorphic expression of a large number of genes in the liver. The slow response of many sex-specific liver genes to changes in plasma GH status suggests that GH acts in the liver via both direct and indirect mechanisms organized in a hierarchical regulatory network. Presently, genome-wide liver transcription profiling was conducted to elucidate the global impact of pituitary hormone ablation on the sex specificity of rat liver gene expression and to identify sex-specific genes that respond rapidly to GH as candidates for direct targets of GH action. Hypophysectomy abolished the sex specificity of approximately 90% of 1032 sex-dependent genes, consistent with the dominant role of pituitary GH in regulating liver sexual dimorphism. Two major classes of sex-specific genes were identified: genes that were down-regulated after hypophysectomy and may be subject to positive GH regulation (461 class I genes), and genes that were up-regulated after hypophysectomy and may be subject to negative GH regulation (224 class II genes). Fifty class I sex-specific genes were induced, and 38 class II sex-specific genes were suppressed within 90 min of a physiological GH pulse, suggesting they are primary GH response genes. A further 71 sex-specific genes responded after a second GH treatment and may correspond to secondary response genes. Twenty four DNA-binding proteins were identified as early GH response genes, of which 15 were induced and nine were suppressed by GH. Five of these 24 genes displayed sex-specific expression, consistent with a hierarchical transcriptional network controlling sex-specific liver gene expression. Class II male-specific genes, such as Cyp2a2 and Cyp2c13, were down-regulated within 30 min of GH pulse treatment, as determined by heterogeneous nuclear RNA analysis, suggesting that transcription of these genes is restricted to the GH-free interpulse period in adult male rat liver. We conclude that GH acts via both positive and negative regulatory mechanisms to establish and maintain the sex specificity of liver gene expression.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsCluster AnalysisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGrowth HormoneHypophysectomyLiverMalePolymerase Chain ReactionRatsRats, Inbred F344Reproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsGrowth Hormone

Identifiers

PMID18483176
PMCPMC2725767
OpenAlexW2156710869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.