Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18481212›Full record

ReviewFolia microbiologica2008

Filament formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae--a review.

J R Dickinson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Folia microbiologica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. EnhancingMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  4. Prediction of Genetic Groups withinJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Nutrient and Stress Sensing in Pathogenic Yeasts.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  8. Necessary and sufficient conditions for protocell growth.Journal of mathematical biology · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Effect of alcohols on filamentation, growth, viability and biofilm development in Candida albicans.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2013
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functional genomics in the study of yeast cell polarity: moving in the right direction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J R DickinsonCardiff School of Bioscences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3TL, UK. Dickinson@cardiff.ac.uk
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many yeasts can produce filamentous elongated cells identifiable as hyphae, pseudohyphae or invasive filaments. Filament formation has been understood as a foraging response that occurs in nutrient-poor conditions. However, fusel alcohols were observed to induce filament formation in rich nutrient conditions in every yeast species examined. Fusel alcohols, e.g., 3-methyl-1-butanol (3Me-BuOH; 'isoamyl alcohol'), 2-methyl-1-propanol (isobutyl alcohol), (-)-2-methyl-1-butanol ('active amyl alcohol'), 2-phenylethanol and 3-(2-hydroxyethyl)indole (tryptophol) (the end products of leucine, valine, isoleucine, phenylalanine and tryptophan catabolism, respectively) are the end products of amino acid catabolism that accumulate when nutrients become limiting. Thus, yeast responds to its own metabolic by-products. Considerable effort was made to define the cell biological and biochemical changes that take place during 3Me-BuOH-induced filamentation. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae filaments contain significantly greater mitochondrial mass and increased chitin content in comparison with yeast-form cells. The global transcriptional response of S. cerevisiae during the early stages of 3Me-BuOH-induced filament formation has been described. Four ORFs displayed very significant (more than 10-fold) increases in their RNA species, and 12 ORFs displayed increases in transcription of more than 5-fold. The transcription of five genes (all of which encode transporters) decreased by similar amounts. Where examined, the activity of the proteins encoded reflected the transcriptional pattern of their respective mRNAs. To understand this regulation, studies were performed to see whether deletion or overexpression of key genes affects the ability to filament and invade solid YEPD medium. This has led to identification of those proteins that are essential for filament formation, repressors and those which are simply not required. It also leads to the conclusion that 3Me-BuOH-induced filament formation is not a foraging response but a response to reduced growth rate.

Indexed as

Biosynthetic PathwaysFatty AlcoholsGene Expression Regulation, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionTranscription, GeneticFatty AlcoholsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18481212
OpenAlexW2121016429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.