Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18481172›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2009

Disruption of estrogen receptor alpha-p53 interaction in breast tumors: a novel mechanism underlying the anti-tumor effect of radiation therapy.

Wensheng Liu, Margot M Ip, Matthew B Podgorsak, Gokul M Das

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emerging roles of aerobic glycolysis in breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The p53-estrogen receptor loop in cancer.Current molecular medicine · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wensheng LiuDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Margot M Ip
Matthew B Podgorsak
Gokul M Das
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
P53 AND ESTROGEN IN PCNA EXPRESSION OSTEOSARCOMA CELLSR01CA079911 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI DAS, GOKUL M · 1999 to 2003
$963k
NCI NIH HHS CA016056NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS R01 CA079911NCI NIH HHS R01CA79911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactivation of tumor suppressor p53 is one of the most frequent events in cancer. Unlike many other cancers, however, p53 gene mutations are infrequent in breast cancers, as about 80% of breast tumors contain wild type p53. The mechanisms underlying functional inactivation of wild type p53 in breast cancer have remained elusive. Besides, how p53 gets activated in breast tumors subjected to radiation therapy remains unknown. We recently reported that in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) directly binds to p53 and represses its function. Furthermore, the ERalpha-p53 interaction was disrupted by ionizing radiation. These observations have important translational implications especially as there are no reliable cellular or molecular criteria for rational radiotherapy for breast cancer. Here we report our studies towards addressing this important issue, using an MCF-7 breast cancer xenograft model in mice. Radiation effectively inhibits growth of these tumors and stabilizes p53, but has no observable effect on ERalpha protein level. Importantly, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays demonstrated that ERalpha interacts with p53 bound to endogenous target gene promoters in tumors in vivo, and this interaction is considerably reduced in response to radiotherapy although p53 level is increased. Concomitant with its effect on ERalpha-p53 interaction, radiation increases p53-mediated transcriptional activation of several target genes and increases p53-mediated transcriptional repression of survivin. Our studies show that disruption of ERalpha-p53 interaction in vivo resulting in restoration of functional p53 is a cellular response to radiation. Radiation could be affecting ERalpha and/or p53 directly or it could be influencing other proteins associated with the ERalpha-p53 complex. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on analysis of DNA-protein-protein interaction occurring on endogenous gene promoters in vivo in breast tumor tissues. These findings suggest that alleviating the inhibitory effect of ERalpha on p53 could be one of the molecular mechanisms underlying activation of p53 by radiation in breast tumors, and therefore, could be exploited to develop more effective ways of combining radiation therapy with systemic therapies such as hormonal therapy and chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorChromatin ImmunoprecipitationCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Estrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHumansMiceNeoplasm TransplantationPromoter Regions, GeneticRadiotherapyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTumor Suppressor Protein p53CDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Estrogen Receptor alphaTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID18481172
PMCPMC4066453
OpenAlexW2081572818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.