Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18481075›Full record

ReviewHistochemistry and cell biology2008

Connexons and cell adhesion: a romantic phase.

Nora Prochnow, Rolf Dermietzel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Wnt-PLC-IPNature communications · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nora ProchnowDepartment of Neuroantomy and Molecular Brain Research, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitystreet 150, 44780, Bochum, Germany. nora.prochnow@rub.de
Rolf Dermietzel
Ruhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates, that gap junction forming proteins do not only contribute to intercellular communication (Kanno and Saffitz in Cardiovasc Pathol 10:169-177, 2001; Saez et al. in Physiol Rev 83:1359-1400, 2003), ion homeostasis and volume control (Goldberg et al. in J Biol Chem 277:36725-36730, 2002; Saez et al. in Physiol Rev 83:1359-1400, 2003). They also serve biological functions in a mechanical sense, supporting adherent connections between neighbouring cells of epithelial and non-epithelial tissues (Clair et al. in Exp Cell Res 314:1250-1265, 2008; Shaw et al. in Cell 128:547-560, 2007), where they stabilize migratory pathways in the developing central nervous system (Elias et al. in Nature 448:901-907, 2007; Malatesta et al. in Development 127:5253-5263, 2000; Noctor et al. in Nature 409:714-720, 2001; Rakic in Brain Res 33:471-476, 1971; J Comp Neurol 145:61-83 1972; Science 241:170-176, 1988), or mediate polarized movements and directionality of neural crest cells during organogenesis (Kirby and Waldo in Circ Res 77:211-215, 1995; Xu et al. in Development 133:3629-3639, 2006). Since, most data describing adhesive properties of gap junctions delt with connexin 43 (Cx43) (Beardslee et al. in Circ Res 83:629-635, 1998), we will focus our brief review on this isoform.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalConnexin 43ConnexinsCytoskeletonGap JunctionsHumansIntercellular JunctionsMyocytes, CardiacCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalConnexin 43Connexins

Identifiers

PMID18481075
PMCPMC2413113
OpenAlexW1973655801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.