Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18480963›Full record

ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter

Key role of receptor density in colloid/cell specific interaction: a quantitative biomimetic study on giant vesicles.

M Lamblet, B Delord, L Johannes, D van Effenterre, P Bassereau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Whole-GUV patch-clamping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Entropy-driven aggregation of adhesion sites of supported membranes.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M LambletUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire PhysicoChimie Curie, Paris, France.
B Delord
L Johannes
D van Effenterre
P Bassereau

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study of the adsorption of colloids on model membranes mediated by specific ligand-receptor interactions. The colloids consist of lipid multilamellar liposomes (spherulites) functionalized with the B-subunit of Shiga Toxin (STxB), while the membranes are lipid Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUV) containing STxB lipid receptor, Globotriaosylceramide (Gb3). Through confocal microscopy and flow cytometry, we show the specificity of the adsorption. Moreover, we show that flow cytometry can be used to efficiently quantify the kinetics of colloid adsorption on GUVs with very good statistics. By varying the bulk colloid concentration and receptor density in the membrane, we point out the existence of an optimum Gb3 density for adsorption. We propose that this optimum corresponds to a transition between reversible colloid adsorption at low Gb3 density and irreversible adsorption, and likely spherulite fusion, at high density. We compare our results both to STxB-colloids adhering on living cells and to free STxB proteins interacting with GUVs containing Gb3. This biomimetic system could be used for a quantitative evaluation of the early stage of virus infection or drug delivery.

Indexed as

BiomimeticsAdsorptionColloidsFlow CytometryKineticsLigandsMicroscopy, ConfocalReceptors, Cell SurfaceShiga ToxinSubstrate SpecificityTrihexosylceramidesUnilamellar LiposomesColloidsglobotriaosylceramideLigandsReceptors, Cell SurfaceShiga ToxinTrihexosylceramidesUnilamellar Liposomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.