Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18480432›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2008

A role for E1B-AP5 in ATR signaling pathways during adenovirus infection.

Andrew N Blackford, Rachel K Bruton, Orkide Dirlik, Grant S Stewart, A Malcolm R Taylor, Thomas Dobner, Roger J A Grand, Andrew S Turnell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The adenovirus DNA-binding protein DBP.Journal of virology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. SARS-CoV-2 and the DNA damage response.The Journal of general virology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Take your PIKK: tumour viruses and DNA damage response pathways.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew N BlackfordCR-UK Institute for Cancer Studies, The Medical School, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Rachel K Bruton
Orkide Dirlik
Grant S Stewart
A Malcolm R Taylor
Thomas Dobner
Roger J A Grand
Andrew S Turnell
University of Birmingham · GBUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E1B-55K-associated protein 5 (E1B-AP5) is a cellular, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein that is targeted by adenovirus (Ad) E1B-55K during infection. The function of E1B-AP5 during infection, however, remains largely unknown. Given the role of E1B-55K targets in the DNA damage response, we examined whether E1B-AP5 function was integral to these pathways. Here, we show a novel role for E1B-AP5 as a key regulator of ATR signaling pathways activated during Ad infection. E1B-AP5 is recruited to viral replication centers during infection, where it colocalizes with ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP) and the ATR substrate replication protein A 32 (RPA32). Indeed, E1B-AP5 associates with ATRIP and RPA complex component RPA70 in both uninfected and Ad-infected cells. Additionally, glutathione S-transferase pull-downs show that E1B-AP5 associates with RPA components RPA70 and RPA32 directly in vitro. E1B-AP5 is required for the ATR-dependent phosphorylation of RPA32 during infection and contributes to the Ad-induced phosphorylation of Smc1 and H2AX. In this regard, it is interesting that Ad5 and Ad12 differentially promote the phosphorylation of RPA32, Rad9, and Smc1 during infection such that Ad12 promotes a significant phosphorylation of RPA32 and Rad9, whereas Ad5 only weakly promotes RPA32 phosphorylation and does not induce Rad9 phosphorylation. These data suggest that Ad5 and Ad12 have evolved different strategies to regulate DNA damage signaling pathways during infection in order to promote viral replication. Taken together, our results define a role for E1B-AP5 in ATR signaling pathways activated during infection. This might have broader implications for the regulation of ATR activity during cellular DNA replication or in response to DNA damage.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenoviridaeAdenovirus E1B ProteinsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsHeterogeneous-Nuclear RibonucleoproteinsHistonesHumansNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReplication Protein AAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenovirus E1B ProteinsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATRIP protein, humanATR protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsH2AX protein, humanHeterogeneous-Nuclear RibonucleoproteinsHistonesHNRNPUL1 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasesrad9 proteinReplication Protein ARPA1 protein, humanRPA2 protein, humanStructural Maintenance of Chromosome Protein 1Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18480432
PMCPMC2493339
OpenAlexW2153075330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.