Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18479174›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2008

Pharmacodynamic analysis of recombinant human erythropoietin effect on reticulocyte production rate and age distribution in healthy subjects.

Juan José Pérez-Ruixo, Wojciech Krzyzanski, Jeremy Hing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Models for the red blood cell lifespan.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pharmacodynamic models of age-structured cell populations.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lifespan based indirect response models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan José Pérez-RuixoClinical Pharmacology, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium. jjperez@umh.es
Wojciech Krzyzanski
Jeremy Hing
Johnson & Johnson (Brazil) · BRJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

MATHEMATICAL MODELS IN PHARMACODYNAMICSR01GM057980 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J., KRZYZANSKI, WOJCIECH · 1998 to 2013
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 57980NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on the reticulocyte production rate and age distribution in healthy subjects.

methodsExtensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data collected from 88 subjects who received a single subcutaneous dose of rHuEPO (dose range 20-160 kIU) were analysed. Four nonlinear mixed-effects models were evaluated to describe the time course of the percentage of reticulocytes and their age distribution in relation to rHuEPO pharmacokinetics. Model A accounted for stimulation of the production of progenitor cells in bone marrow, and model B implemented shortening of differentiation and maturation times of early progenitors in bone marrow. Model C was the combination of models A and B, and model D was the combination of model A with an increase in the maturation times of the circulating reticulocytes. Model evaluation was performed using goodness-of-fit plots, a nonparametric bootstrap and a posterior predictive check.

resultsModel D was selected as the best model, and evidenced accurate and precise estimation of model parameters and prediction of the time course of the percentage of reticulocytes. At baseline, the estimated circulating reticulocyte maturation time was 2.6 days, whereas the lifespan of the precursors in the bone marrow was about 5 days. The rHuEPO potency for the stimulatory effect (7.61 IU/L) was higher than that for the increase in reticulocyte maturation times (56.3 IU/L). There was a significant 1- to 2-day lag time in the reticulocyte response. The effect of rHuEPO on the reticulocyte age distribution consisted of a transient increase in the reticulocyte maturation time from baseline up to 6-7 days, occurring 1 day after administration. The dose-dependent amplitude of the changes in the age distribution lasted for 12-14 days. The model-predicted peak increase in the reticulocyte release rate ranged from 140% to 160% of the baseline value and was maximal on days 7-8 following rHuEPO administration.

conclusionsA semiphysiological model quantifying the effect of rHuEPO on the reticulocyte production rate and age distribution was developed. The validated model predicts that rHuEPO increases the reticulocyte production rate and modifies the reticulocyte age distribution in a dose-dependent manner.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge DistributionClinical Trials as TopicErythropoietinHematinicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsReticulocyte CountReticulocytesErythropoietinHematinicsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18479174
PMCPMC3145321
OpenAlexW2044819391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.