Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18477586›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2008

Effects of X-linkage and sex-biased gene expression on the rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

John F Baines, Stanley A Sawyer, Daniel L Hartl, John Parsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Evolution across Mouse Spermatogenesis.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Sex chromosome degeneration, turnover, and sex-biased expression of sex-linked transcripts in African clawed frogs (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John F BainesSection of Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology, University of Munich, 82152 Munich, Germany.
Stanley A Sawyer
Daniel L Hartl
John Parsch
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHarvard University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS AND DIVERSITY IN MALARIAR01GM061351 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI WIRTH, DYANN F · 2000 to 2007
$3.7M
Evolutionary Genomics of DrosophilaR01GM068465 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HARTL, DANIEL L · 2004 to 2007
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM61351NIGMS NIH HHS GM68465NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061351NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patterns of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila protein-coding genes suggest that a considerable fraction of amino acid differences between species can be attributed to positive selection and that genes with sex-biased expression, that is, those expressed predominantly in one sex, have especially high rates of adaptive evolution. Previous studies, however, have been restricted to autosomal sex-biased genes and, thus, do not provide a complete picture of the evolutionary forces acting on sex-biased genes across the genome. To determine the effects of X-linkage on sex-biased gene evolution, we surveyed DNA sequence polymorphism and divergence in 45 X-linked genes, including 17 with male-biased expression, 13 with female-biased expression, and 15 with equal expression in the 2 sexes. Using both single- and multilocus tests for selection, we found evidence for adaptive evolution in both groups of sex-biased genes. The signal of adaptive evolution was particularly strong for X-linked male-biased genes. A comparison with data from 91 autosomal genes revealed a "fast-X" effect, in which the rate of adaptive evolution was greater for X-linked than for autosomal genes. This effect was strongest for male-biased genes but could be seen in the other groups as well. A genome-wide analysis of coding sequence divergence that accounted for sex-biased expression also uncovered a fast-X effect for male-biased and unbiased genes, suggesting that recessive beneficial mutations play an important role in adaptation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene ExpressionPolymorphism, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsBase SequenceDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenes, X-LinkedMaleMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNASex FactorsDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18477586
PMCPMC2727381
OpenAlexW2170268763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.