Trial reportAnnals of family medicine
Physician responses to a community-level trial promoting judicious antibiotic use.
Trial report in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Public target interventions to reduce the inappropriate use of medicines or medical procedures: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Communication interventions to promote the public's awareness of antibiotics: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2019Pooled it
- Educational interventions to improve prescription and dispensing of antibiotics: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2014Pooled it
- Reducing antibiotic prescribing for children with respiratory tract infections in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013Pooled it
- Long-term effects of an educational seminar on antibiotic prescribing by GPs: a randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013Trial
- Development and maintenance of consensus recommendations on pediatric outpatient antibiotic therapy in Germany: a framework for rational use.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- 'Some patients demand for a prescription of an antibiotic': an assessment of barriers and facilitators to rational antimicrobial use in a private health facility in Uganda.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024Article
- Implementation and impact of pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs: a systematic scoping review.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2020Article
- Impact of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on antimicrobial prescriptions in young children: a whole population study.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Observational
- Antibiotic Use in Febrile Children Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Article
- Strategic measures for the control of surging antimicrobial resistance in Hong Kong and mainland of China.Emerging microbes & infections · 2015Review
- Knowledge, attitude and practice of antibiotics: a questionnaire study among 2500 Chinese students.BMC medical education · 2013Article
- Trends in antibiotic use in Massachusetts children, 2000-2009.Pediatrics · 2012Article
- Infectious disease management in primary care: perceptions of GPs.BMC family practice · 2011Article
- The impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes in paediatric emergency departments and primary care: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn an environment of multiple campaigns promoting judicious antibiotic use in children, identification of effective strategies is important. We assessed physician responses to a community-level intervention with respect to antibiotic prescribing, related practices, and perceived effectiveness.
methodsThis study was a mixed qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a randomized controlled community-wide educational intervention in 16 Massachusetts communities. Physicians in intervention communities received locally endorsed guidelines, group educational sessions, and biweekly newsletters. Parents simultaneously received materials in physicians' offices and by mail. After the intervention, we conducted a mailed physician survey and individual interviews to assess the impact of the intervention. We compared survey responses for intervention and control physicians, and we analyzed interview transcripts to provide in-depth information about selected topics.
resultsAmong survey respondents (n = 168), 91% of intervention and 4% of control physicians reported receiving intervention materials. Physicians received information from multiple other sources. More intervention than control physicians reported decreased antibiotic prescribing from 2000-2003 (75% vs 58%, P = .03), but there were no differences between groups in knowledge, attitudes, or behaviors favoring judicious antibiotic use. Both groups were concerned about antibiotic resistance and reported room to reduce their own prescribing. Interviewed physicians suggested frequent repetition of messages, brief written materials on specific topics for themselves and patients, and promotion in the mass media as the most effective strategies to reduce prescribing.
conclusionsIn multiple communities an intervention in physician offices to promote judicious antibiotic prescribing reached its intended audience, but physicians' self-reported attitudes and practices were similar in intervention and control communities. Campaigns that repeat brief, consistent reminders to multiple stakeholder groups may be most effective at assuring judicious antibiotic use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.