Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18474406›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2008

Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors.

Victor Frenkel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Theranostic Diagnostics.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Victor FrenkelDiagnostic Radiology Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. vfrenkel@cc.nih.gov

Funding

Image Guided Focused Ultrasound For Drug Delivery and Tissue AblationZ01CL040012 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI WOOD, BRADFORD · 2008 to 2008
$33k
Preclinical high intensity focused ultrasound: mechanisms and applicationsZIACL040014 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI FRANK, JOSEPH · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been shown that therapeutic ultrasound can be used effectively to ablate solid tumors, and a variety of cancers are presently being treated in the clinic using these types of ultrasound exposures. There is, however, an ever-increasing body of preclinical literature that demonstrates how ultrasound energy can also be used non-destructively for increasing the efficacy of drugs and genes for improving cancer treatment. In this review, a summary of the most important ultrasound mechanisms will be given with a detailed description of how each one can be employed for a variety of applications. This includes the manner by which acoustic energy deposition can be used to create changes in tissue permeability for enhancing the delivery of conventional agents, as well as for deploying and activating drugs and genes via specially tailored vehicles and formulations.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyDrug Delivery SystemsGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHumansUltrasonicsUltrasonic TherapyAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID18474406
PMCPMC2491332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.