Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18472033›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2008

Age-dependent cognitive changes in carriers of the fragile X syndrome.

Kim M Cornish, Lexin Li, Cary S Kogan, Sebastien Jacquemont, Jeremy Turk, Ann Dalton, Randi J Hagerman, Paul J Hagerman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. FMR1 CGG Repeats and Stress Influence Self-Reported Cognitive Functioning in Mothers.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Implications of thePediatrics · 2017
    Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Kim M CornishNeuroscience Laboratory for Research and Education in Developmental Disorders, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. kim.cornish@mcgill.ca
Lexin Li
Cary S Kogan
Sebastien Jacquemont
Jeremy Turk
Ann Dalton
Randi J Hagerman
Paul J Hagerman
UC Davis Health System · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRMcGill University · CANorth Carolina State University · USSheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

GENOTYPE/PHENOTYPE RELATIONSHIPS IN FRAGILE X FAMILIESR01HD036071 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI PAUL J HAGERMAN, RANDI J. HAGERMAN · 1998 to 2026
$13.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD036071Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is caused by the silencing of a single gene on the X chromosome, the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. Affected individuals display a unique neurocognitive phenotype that includes significant impairment in inhibitory control, selective attention, working memory, and visual-spatial cognition. In contrast, little is known about the trajectory and specificity of any cognitive impairment associated with the fragile X premutation (i.e., "carrier status") or its relationship with the recently identified neurodegenerative disorder, fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). In the present study, we evaluated a broad sample of 40 premutation males (PM) aged 18-69 years matched on age and IQ to 67 unaffected comparison males (NC). Performance was compared across a range of cognitive domains known to be impaired in fragile X syndrome (i.e., "full mutation"). Tremor was also assessed using a self-report neurological questionnaire. PM displayed statistically significant deficits in their ability to inhibit prepotent responses, differentiating them from NC from age 30 onwards. With increasing age, the two groups follow different trajectories, with PM developing progressively more severe problems in inhibitory control. This deficit also has a strong co-occurrence in males displaying FXTAS-related symptomatology (p<.001). Selective attention was also impaired in PM but did not show any disproportionate aging effect. No other cognitive deficits were observed. We conclude that an inhibitory deficit and its impact across the lifespan are specifically associated with the fragile X premutation status, and may be a precursor for development of a more severe form of cognitive impairment or dementia, which has been reported in patients with the diagnosis of FXTAS.

Indexed as

Gene DosageInhibition, PsychologicalAdultAgedAgingAttentionCase-Control StudiesCognitionDisease ProgressionDNA Mutational AnalysisFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeHeterozygoteHumansIntelligenceMaleFMR1 protein, humanFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

Identifiers

PMID18472033
PMCPMC11060834
OpenAlexW2053995842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.