Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18471586›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2008

Increasing sun protection in winter outdoor recreation a theory-based health communication program.

Barbara J Walkosz, David B Buller, Peter A Andersen, Michael D Scott, Mark B Dignan, Gary R Cutter, Julie A Maloy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01804595 (A Randomized Control Trial of Sun Protection Interventions for Operating Engineers), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01804595 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Control Trial of Sun Protection Interventions for Operating Engineers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2012 to 2013Enrolled357ConditionsSkin Cancer PreventionArmsSunscreen, Text-Message Reminders, Sunscreen and Text Message Reminders, Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara J WalkoszUniversity of Colorado, Denver Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80217, USA. Barbara.Walkosz@cudenver.edu
David B Buller
Peter A Andersen
Michael D Scott
Mark B Dignan
Gary R Cutter
Julie A Maloy

Funding

SUN SAFETY FOR HIGH ALTITUDE SKI AREA STAFF AND GUESTSR01CA081028 · NCI · COOPER INSTITUTE · PI BULLER, DAVID B · 2000 to 2002
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA81028NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnprotected and excessive exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is the primary risk factor for skin cancer.

designA pair-matched, group-randomized, pre-test/post-test, quasi-experimental design, with ski resorts as the unit of randomization, tested the effectiveness of Go Sun Smart, a multi-channel skin cancer prevention program. Independent samples of guests were taken at baseline (2001) and follow-up (2002); data were analyzed in 2006. SETTING AND

participantsA total of 6516 adult guests at 26 ski areas in the western U.S. and Canada were recruited, consented, and interviewed on chairlifts. This study was nested within an occupational intervention for ski area workers.

interventionSki areas were pair-matched and randomized to receive Go Sun Smart, which consisted of print, electronic, visual, and interpersonal skin cancer prevention messages.

main outcome measuresSun-protection behaviors, sunburning, recall of sun-protection messages, and the association of message exposure to sun protection.

resultsThe difference in recall of all sun-protection messages, messages on signs and posters, and the Go Sun Smart logo was significant between the intervention and control resorts. Reported use of sun-protection practices was higher by guests at intervention ski areas using more (a higher dose of) Go Sun Smart materials. Intervention-group guests who recalled a sun-safety message were more likely to practice sun safety than intervention-group guests who did not recall a message and control-group guests.

conclusionsWhile the mere implementation of Go Sun Smart did not produce sun-safety improvements, Go Sun Smart appeared to be effective for guests who encountered and remembered it. Many factors can work against message exposure. Signage seemed to produce the greatest increase in exposure to sun-safety messages.

Indexed as

SeasonsSkiingAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedSunburnSunscreening AgentsSunscreening Agents

Identifiers

PMID18471586
PMCPMC2657339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.