Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18470571›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2008

Isolated hepatic perfusion with 200 mg melphalan for advanced noncolorectal liver metastases.

Liselot B J van Iersel, Ellen J Hoekman, Hans Gelderblom, Alexander L Vahrmeijer, Els L van Persijn van Meerten, Fred G J Tijl, Henk H Hartgrink, Peter J K Kuppen, Johan W R Nortier, Rob A E M Tollenaar and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Regional chemotherapy for uveal melanoma liver metastases.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Isolated hepatic perfusion for patients with liver metastases.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2014
    Review
  14. Two cases of partial hepatectomy for malignant melanoma.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liselot B J van IerselDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. l.b.j.van_iersel@lumc.nl
Ellen J Hoekman
Hans Gelderblom
Alexander L Vahrmeijer
Els L van Persijn van Meerten
Fred G J Tijl
Henk H Hartgrink
Peter J K Kuppen
Johan W R Nortier
Rob A E M Tollenaar
Cornelis J H van de Velde
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe liver is one of the most common sites for metastatic solid tumors. If the liver is the only site of metastatic disease, regional treatment options can offer the benefit of high local exposure with limited systemic toxicity, especially for patients without (further) systemic treatment options. We report the results of our experience with isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) in patients with isolated liver metastases from a variety of primary tumors. PATIENTS AND

methodsNineteen patients with isolated unresectable liver metastases from a variety of tumors (13 uveal melanomas, 2 neuroendocrine carcinomas, 2 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 1 hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1 high-grade sarcoma) were treated with a 60-min IHP using 200 mg melphalan. Patients were monitored for toxicity, response according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria, and survival.

resultsOne melanoma patient was not perfused due to insufficient isolation of the liver. There was no treatment-related mortality. Reversible grade 3 or 4 hepatoxicity occurred in 10 (56%) patients, while veno-occlusive disease occurred in 4 (22%) patients. Of the 12 uveal melanoma patients who were perfused, 4 (33%) patients had a partial hepatic response, 6 (50%) patients had stable hepatic disease, and 2 (17%) patients were immediately progressive. Median disease-free survival was 6.6 months with a median overall survival of 10.0 months. Fifty percent of other primary tumors showed at least partial remission, including one complete remission in a high-grade sarcoma patient.

conclusionIHP with melphalan shows activity in patients with liver metastases from a variety of primary tumors, but other or additional drugs may improve therapeutic outcome.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMelphalanMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID18470571
PMCPMC2467497
OpenAlexW2095582511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.