Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18470278›Full record

ArticleReviews in urology2008

Clinical utility of prostate carcinoma molecular diagnostic tests.

Scott B Shappell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in urology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Long non-coding RNAeLife · 2024
    Article
  3. Diagnostic utility of a-methylacyl COA racemase in prostate cancer of the Iranian population.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Long non-coding RNAs in cancer: implications for personalized therapy.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Non-Coding RNAs: Functional Aspects and Diagnostic Utility in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Urine markers and prostate cancer.Central European journal of urology · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott B ShappellMosaic Diagnostics Dallas, TX.
CS Diagnostics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instead of relying on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to identify patients for prostate biopsy, new laboratory tests are needed that have improved specificity for prostate carcinoma (CaP), allow accurate classification of clinically insignificant CaPs, allow for detection of clinically significant CaP in patients without elevated serum PSA, and allow for identification of aggressive forms of CaP, which may warrant adjunctive or even molecularly targeted therapy in the future. Over the last several years, high-throughput gene expression profiling and proteinomics have led to the identification of genes and proteins that are specifically overexpressed in CaP. Molecular diagnostic techniques readily translated to the clinical laboratory have been incorporated into the development of new tests based on these novel molecular alterations in CaP. Some of these tests already have well-documented clinical utility, such as in facilitating prostate biopsy decisions, and are routinely available. The current review focuses on the biological, clinical, and laboratory aspects of the most promising of these current and near-future molecular CaP tests.

Indexed as

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemaseDNAEarly prostate cancer antigenERGMolecular diagnosticsProstate cancer antigen 3Prostate carcinomaRNATransmembrane protease, serine 2

Identifiers

PMID18470278
PMCPMC2312347
OpenAlexW1579882000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.