Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18468743›Full record

ArticleVaccine2008

Increased immune responses in rhesus macaques by DNA vaccination combined with electroporation.

Margherita Rosati, Antonio Valentin, Rashmi Jalah, Vainav Patel, Agneta von Gegerfelt, Cristina Bergamaschi, Candido Alicea, Deborah Weiss, Jim Treece, Ranajit Pal and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. mSphere · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Margherita RosatiHuman Retrovirus Section, Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702-1201, United States.
Antonio Valentin
Rashmi Jalah
Vainav Patel
Agneta von Gegerfelt
Cristina Bergamaschi
Candido Alicea
Deborah Weiss
Jim Treece
Ranajit Pal
Phillip D Markham
Ernesto T A Marques
J Thomas August
Amir Khan
Ruxandra Draghia-Akli
Barbara K Felber
George N Pavlakis
Center for Cancer Research · USAdvanced Bioscience Laboratories (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USBioScience Laboratories (United States) · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Prevention of AIDSZIABC010350 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FELBER, BARBARA K · 2009 to 2025
$30.0M
Immunotherapeutic Approaches for AIDSZIABC010749 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PAVLAKIS, GEORGE N. · 2009 to 2022
$21.6M
Heterodimeric IL-15 in Cancer ImmunotherapyZIABC010750 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PAVLAKIS, GEORGE N. · 2009 to 2022
$15.6M
Prevention of AIDSZ01BC010350 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FELBER, BARBARA K · 2000 to 2008
$3.2M
DNA VaccinesZ01BC010749 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PAVLAKIS, GEORGE N. · 2006 to 2008
$1.7M
HIV Molecular Biology and Pathogenic Mechanisms of AIDSZ01BC010750 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PAVLAKIS, GEORGE N. · 2006 to 2008
$919k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used optimized DNA expression vectors to compare two gene delivery methodologies in rhesus macaques, namely direct DNA injection and in vivo adaptive constant-current electroporation via the intramuscular route. The use of in vivo electroporation increased levels of gene expression and immune responses. We used an optimized HIV gag expression plasmid to show the development of new cellular immune responses in SIV-infected animals controlling viremia. Furthermore, after vaccination with SIV expression plasmids the recall responses to the SIV antigens were very high, indicating that DNA is a strong boost in the presence of antiretroviral treatment in SIV-infected animals. There was substantial animal-to-animal variability in DNA expression, revealed by plasma measurements of IL-15 produced by co-injected IL-15 DNA. IL-15 expression levels correlated with peak immune responses. Electroporation led to an expansion of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells of both central and effector memory phenotype. These results indicate that improved gene delivery and expression by electroporation dramatically increases immunogenicity of DNA vaccines. Electroporation is thus an important method to improve the effectiveness of DNA vaccination.

Indexed as

ElectroporationSAIDS VaccinesVaccines, DNAAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-Lymphocytesgag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusHumansImmunologic MemoryInjections, IntramuscularMacaca mulattaPlasmidsSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusVaccinationViremiagag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusSAIDS VaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID18468743
PMCPMC7263013
OpenAlexW1975622492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.