Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18468671›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2008

Critical issues in mucosal immunity for HIV-1 vaccine development.

Barton F Haynes, Robin J Shattock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. RecombinantVaccines · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sexual violence and HIV transmission: summary proceedings of a scientific research planning meeting.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2013
    Article
  12. Overview of microbicides for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barton F HaynesDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA. hayne002@mc.duke.edu
Robin J Shattock

Funding

Viral Sequencing CoreU19AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CRUMP, JOHN ANDREW · 2006 to 2011
$290.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI-0678501NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of a safe and effective vaccine for HIV-1 infection is a critical global priority. However, the nature of host-virus interactions that lead to early immunosuppression and CD4 depletion, HIV-1 diversity, and the inability of the immune system to eliminate the latently infected CD4 pool of cells has to date thwarted successful vaccine development. Moreover, both the initial antibody-inducing vaccine (protein envelope gp120) and cell-mediated vaccine (recombinant adenovirus containing HIV-1 genes) strategies have failed in efficacy trials, and the latter cell-mediated vaccine appeared to have caused enhanced HIV-1 acquisition. Thus basic and translational research to understand why current vaccines have failed and elucidation of new mechanisms of virus control at mucosal surfaces is essential for eventual successful development of a preventive HIV-1 vaccine.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansImmunity, MucosalAIDS VaccinesHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID18468671
PMCPMC3014573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.