Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18467365›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2008

Ca2+ microdomains near plasma membrane Ca2+ channels: impact on cell function.

Anant B Parekh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Orai1-mediated CaExperimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Activation of nuclear CaCell reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. CaInflammation and regeneration · 2025
    Review
  10. Split genetically encoded calcium indicators for interorganellar junctions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. CaCell reports · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. CaCell calcium · 2022
    Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anant B ParekhDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. anant.parekh@dpag.ox.ac.uk

Funding

British Heart FoundationMedical Research Council G0200218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In eukaryotic cells, a rise in cytoplasmic Ca(2+) can activate a plethora of responses that operate on time scales ranging from milliseconds to days. Inherent to the use of a promiscuous signal like Ca(2+) is the problem of specificity: how can Ca(2+) activate some responses but not others? We now know that the spatial profile of the Ca(2+) signal is important Ca(2+) does not simply rise uniformly throughout the cytoplasm upon stimulation but can reach very high levels locally, creating spatial gradients. The most fundamental local Ca(2+) signal is the Ca(2+) microdomain that develops rapidly near open plasmalemmal Ca(2+) channels like voltage-gated L-type (Cav1.2) and store-operated CRAC channels. Recent work has revealed that Ca(2+) microdomains arising from these channels are remarkably versatile in triggering a range of responses that differ enormously in both temporal and spatial profile. Here, I delineate basic features of Ca(2+) microdomains and then describe how these highly local signals are used by Ca(2+)-permeable channels to drive cellular responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnuraCalcium ChannelsCalcium SignalingCell MembraneHumansNeuronsProtein Structure, TertiaryCalcium Channels

Identifiers

PMID18467365
PMCPMC2538792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.