Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18467031›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2008

Cell-cell interaction modulates neuroectodermal specification of embryonic stem cells.

Biju Parekkadan, Yevgeny Berdichevsky, Daniel Irimia, Avrum Leeder, Gabriel Yarmush, Mehmet Toner, John B Levine, Martin L Yarmush

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stem cell colony interspacing effect on differentiation to neural cells.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The niche in single-cell technologies.Immunology and cell biology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Biju ParekkadanCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and the Shriners Hospitals for Children, Boston, MA, USA.
Yevgeny Berdichevsky
Daniel Irimia
Avrum Leeder
Gabriel Yarmush
Mehmet Toner
John B Levine
Martin L Yarmush
Shriners Hospitals for Children - Boston · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Bio-MicroElectroMechanical Systems Resource CenterP41EB002503 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TONER, MEHMET · 2004 to 2018
$17.4M
HEPATIC TISSUE ENGINEERINGR01DK043371 · NIDDK · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI YARMUSH, MARTIN L · 1992 to 2006
$2.4M
Training in Stem Cell ResearchK18DK076819 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI YARMUSH, MARTIN L · 2006 to 2006
$187k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB-002503NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002503NIDDK NIH HHS K18 DK076819NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK043371NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK43371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The controlled differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells is of utmost interest to their clinical, biotechnological, and basic science use. Many investigators have combinatorially assessed the role of specific soluble factors and extracellular matrices in guiding ES cell fate, yet the interaction between neighboring cells in these heterogeneous cultures has been poorly defined due to a lack of conventional tools to specifically uncouple these variables. Herein, we explored the role of cell-cell interactions during neuroectodermal specification of ES cells using a microfabricated cell pair array. We tracked differentiation events in situ, using an ES cell line expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the regulation of the Sox1 gene promoter, an early marker of neuroectodermal germ cell commitment in the adult forebrain. We observed that a previously specified Sox1-GFP+ cell could induce the specification of an undifferentiated ES cell. This induction was modulated by the two cells being in contact and was dependent on the age of previously specified cell prior to coculture. A screen of candidate cell adhesion molecules revealed that the expression of connexin (Cx)-43 correlated with the age-dependent effect of cell contact in cell pair experiments. ES cells deficient in Cx-43 showed aberrant neuroectodermal specification and lineage commitment, highlighting the importance of gap junctional signaling in the development of this germ layer. Moreover, this study demonstrates the integration of microscale culture techniques to explore the biology of ES cells and gain insight into relevant developmental processes otherwise undefined due to bulk culture methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCell LineCell LineageCentral Nervous SystemCoculture TechniquesConnexin 43DNA-Binding ProteinsEctodermEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryonic Stem CellsGap JunctionsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsConnexin 43DNA-Binding ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesSox1 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18467031
PMCPMC2448393
OpenAlexW1977704636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.