Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18466572›Full record

ArticleBMC proceedings2007

Exploring epistasis in candidate genes for rheumatoid arthritis.

Marylyn D Ritchie, Jacquelaine Bartlett, William S Bush, Todd L Edwards, Alison A Motsinger, Eric S Torstenson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC proceedings, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marylyn D RitchieDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Human Genetics Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 21st Avenue South and Garland Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA. ritchie@chgr.mc.vanderbilt.edu
Jacquelaine Bartlett
William S Bush
Todd L Edwards
Alison A Motsinger
Eric S Torstenson
Center for Human Genetics · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

PHARMACOGENOMICS OF ARRHYTHMIA THERAPYU01HL065962 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2001 to 2009
$24.8M
Pharmacogenomics of Arrhythmia TherapyU19HL065962 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2010 to 2014
$17.4M
Revealing Epistasis in Alzheimer DiseaseR01AG020135 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARTIN, EDEN R. · 2002 to 2006
$2.7M
Genetics Training Program: Implications of VariationT32GM062758 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS III, JOHN ATLAS · 2001 to 2005
$946k
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL065962NHLBI NIH HHS U19 HL065962NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020135NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM062758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of susceptibility genes for common, chronic disease presents great challenges. The development of novel statistical and computational methodologies to help identify these genes is an area of great necessity. Much research is ongoing and the Genetic Analysis Workshop (GAW) is a venue for the dissemination and comparison of many of these methods. GAW15 included real data sets to look for disease susceptibility genes for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA is a complex, chronic inflammatory disease with several replicated disease genes, but much of the genetic variation in the phenotype remains unexplained. We applied two computational methods, namely multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) and grammatical evolution neural networks (GENN), to three data sets from GAW15. While these analytic methods were applied with the intention of detecting of multilocus models of association, both methods identified a strong single locus effect of a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in PTPN22 that is significantly associated with RA. This SNP has previously been associated with RA in several other published studies. These results demonstrate that both MDR and GENN are capable of identifying a single-locus main effect, in addition to multilocus models of association. This is the first published comparison of the two methods. Because GENN employs an evolutionary computation search strategy in comparison to the exhaustive search strategy of MDR, it is encouraging that the two methods produced similar results. This comparison should be extended in future studies with both simulated and real data.

Identifiers

PMID18466572
PMCPMC2367541
OpenAlexW2121923139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.