Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18462968›Full record

ReviewPulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics2008

Using guinea pigs in studies relevant to asthma and COPD.

Brendan J Canning, Yangling Chou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recombinant human diamine oxidase prevents hemodynamic effects of continuous histamine infusion in guinea pigs.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Evidence for AlphaThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Turkish journal of chemistry · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brendan J CanningJohns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center, 5501 Hopkins Bayview Circle, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. bjc@jhmi.edu
Yangling Chou

Funding

Reflexes and Supraesophageal Consequences Reflux DiseaseR01HL083192 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CANNING, BRENDAN J · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The guinea pig has been the most commonly used small animal species in preclinical studies related to asthma and COPD. The primary advantages of the guinea pig are the similar potencies and efficacies of agonists and antagonists in human and guinea pig airways and the many similarities in physiological processes, especially airway autonomic control and the response to allergen. The primary disadvantages to using guinea pigs are the lack of transgenic methods, limited numbers of guinea pig strains for comparative studies and a prominent axon reflex that is unlikely to be present in human airways. These attributes and various models developed in guinea pigs are discussed.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGuinea PigsHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID18462968
PMCPMC2882537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.