Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18462751›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2008

Alternative relay domains of Drosophila melanogaster myosin differentially affect ATPase activity, in vitro motility, myofibril structure and muscle function.

William A Kronert, Corey M Dambacher, Aileen F Knowles, Douglas M Swank, Sanford I Bernstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interacting-heads motif has been conserved as a mechanism of myosin II inhibition since before the origin of animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  8. ADisease models & mechanisms · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William A KronertDepartment of Biology, Molecular Biology Institute and Heart Institute, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4614, USA.
Corey M Dambacher
Aileen F Knowles
Douglas M Swank
Sanford I Bernstein
San Diego State University · USRensselaer Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

Genetics and Molecular Biology of Striated Muscle MyosinR01GM032443 · NIGMS · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BERNSTEIN, SANFORD I · 1985 to 2016
$6.4M
Myosin structural and kinetic mechanisms that differentiate fast and slow muscle R01AR055611 · NIAMS · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI SWANK, DOUGLAS M · 2007 to 2012
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055611NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032443NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM32443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relay domain of myosin is hypothesized to function as a communication pathway between the nucleotide-binding site, actin-binding site and the converter domain. In Drosophila melanogaster, a single myosin heavy chain gene encodes three alternative relay domains. Exon 9a encodes the indirect flight muscle isoform (IFI) relay domain, whereas exon 9b encodes one of the embryonic body wall isoform (EMB) relay domains. To gain a better understanding of the function of the relay domain and the differences imparted by the IFI and the EMB versions, we constructed two transgenic Drosophila lines expressing chimeric myosin heavy chains in indirect flight muscles lacking endogenous myosin. One expresses the IFI relay domain in the EMB backbone (EMB-9a), while the second expresses the EMB relay domain in the IFI backbone (IFI-9b). Our studies reveal that the EMB relay domain is functionally equivalent to the IFI relay domain when it is substituted into IFI. Essentially no differences in ATPase activity, actin-sliding velocity, flight ability at room temperature or muscle structure are observed in IFI-9b compared to native IFI. However, when the EMB relay domain is replaced with the IFI relay domain, we find a 50% reduction in actin-activated ATPase activity, a significant increase in actin affinity, abolition of actin sliding, defects in myofibril assembly and rapid degeneration of muscle structure compared to EMB. We hypothesize that altered relay domain conformational changes in EMB-9a impair intramolecular communication with the EMB-specific converter domain. This decreases transition rates involving strongly bound actomyosin states, leading to a reduced ATPase rate and loss of actin motility.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMuscle, SkeletalMyofibrilsMyosinsProtein ConformationProtein IsoformsTransgenesAdenosine TriphosphatasesDrosophila ProteinsMyosinsProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID18462751
PMCPMC2528879
OpenAlexW2107070610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.