Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18461485›Full record

ReviewChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2008

Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.

John F Marko

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Engineering Chromosome Bridges Through CRISPR/Cas9 to Decipher the Impact of Intercentromeric Distance on Resolution Dynamics.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Ipsilateral restriction of chromosome movement along a centrosome, and apical-basal axis during the cell cycle.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanical Forces in Nuclear Organization.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Mitotic chromosomes.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Emergent properties of mitotic chromosomes.Current opinion in cell biology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John F MarkoDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, and Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. john-marko@northwestern.edu
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitotic chromosomes respond elastically to forces in the nanonewton range, a property important to transduction of stresses used as mechanical regulatory signals during cell division. In addition to being important biologically, chromosome elasticity can be used as a tool for investigating the folding of chromatin. This paper reviews experiments studying stretching and bending stiffness of mitotic chromosomes, plus experiments where changes in chromosome elasticity resulting from chemical and enzyme treatments were used to analyse connectivity of chromatin inside chromosomes. Experiments with nucleases indicate that non-DNA elements constraining mitotic chromatin must be isolated from one another, leading to the conclusion that mitotic chromosomes have a chromatin 'network' or 'gel' organization, with stretches of chromatin strung between 'crosslinking' points. The as-yet unresolved questions of the identities of the putative chromatin crosslinkers and their organization inside mitotic chromosomes are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosomesDeoxyribonucleasesDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIElasticityHumansMicromanipulationMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastMitosisModels, BiologicalPeptide HydrolasesSaltsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDeoxyribonucleasesDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIPeptide HydrolasesSalts

Identifiers

PMID18461485
OpenAlexW2114979281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.