Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18460505›Full record

GuidelineChest2008

Definitive care for the critically ill during a disaster: medical resources for surge capacity: from a Task Force for Mass Critical Care summit meeting, January 26-27, 2007, Chicago, IL.

Lewis Rubinson, John L Hick, J Randall Curtis, Richard D Branson, Suzi Burns, Michael D Christian, Asha V Devereaux, Jeffrey R Dichter, Daniel Talmor, Brian Erstad and 3 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Chest, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Caring for Critically Ill Adults in PICUs Is Not "Child's Play".Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Article
  10. The pharmacist's role in disaster research response.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2020
    Article
  11. Augmenting the Disaster Healthcare Workforce.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Wind disasters: A comprehensive review of current management strategies.International journal of critical illness and injury science · 2013
    Article
  17. Supplies and equipment for pediatric emergency mass critical care.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lewis RubinsonUniversity of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Campus Box 359762, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. rubinson@u.washington.edu
John L Hick
J Randall Curtis
Richard D Branson
Suzi Burns
Michael D Christian
Asha V Devereaux
Jeffrey R Dichter
Daniel Talmor
Brian Erstad
Justine Medina
James A Geiling
Task Force for Mass Critical Care

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMass numbers of critically ill disaster victims will stress the abilities of health-care systems to maintain usual critical care services for all in need. To enhance the number of patients who can receive life-sustaining interventions, the Task Force on Mass Critical Care (hereafter termed the Task Force) has suggested a framework for providing limited, essential critical care, termed emergency mass critical care (EMCC). This article suggests medical equipment, concepts to expand treatment spaces, and staffing models for EMCC.

methodsConsensus suggestions for EMCC were derived from published clinical practice guidelines and medical resource utilization data for the everyday critical care conditions that are anticipated to predominate during mass critical care events. When necessary, expert opinion was used. TASK FORCE MAJOR SUGGESTIONS: The Task Force makes the following suggestions: (1) one mechanical ventilator that meets specific characteristics, as well as a set of consumable and durable medical equipment, should be provided for each EMCC patient; (2) EMCC should be provided in hospitals or similarly equipped structures; after ICUs, postanesthesia care units, and emergency departments all reach capacity, hospital locations should be repurposed for EMCC in the following order: (A) step-down units and large procedure suites, (B) telemetry units, and (C) hospital wards; and (3) hospitals can extend the provision of critical care using non-critical care personnel via a deliberate model of delegation to match staff competencies with patient needs. DISCUSSION: By using the Task Force suggestions for adequate supplies of medical equipment, appropriate treatment space, and trained staff, communities may better prepare to deliver augmented essential critical care in response to disasters.

Indexed as

Mass Casualty IncidentsCritical CareHealth ResourcesHumansUnited StatesVentilators, MechanicalWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID18460505
PMCPMC7094478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.