ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2008
Distinct evolutionary patterns between chemoreceptors of 2 vertebrate olfactory systems and the differential tuning hypothesis.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential of Small Molecule TAAR-1 Agonists for the Therapy of Neurodegenerative Psychosis: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- First Immunohistochemical Demonstration of the Expression of a Type-2 Vomeronasal Receptor, V2R2, in Wild Canids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Synchronized Expansion and Contraction of Olfactory, Vomeronasal, and Taste Receptor Gene Families in Hystricomorph Rodents.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- The PROUST hypothesis: the embodiment of olfactory cognition.Animal cognition · 2023Review
- Comparative Neuroanatomical Study of the Main Olfactory Bulb in Domestic and Wild Canids: Dog, Wolf and Red Fox.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- How the evolution of air breathing shaped hippocampal function.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Interpretive review: Semiochemicals in domestic pigs and dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Appeasing Pheromones for the Management of Stress and Aggression during Conservation of Wild Canids: Could the Solution Be Right under Our Nose?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Coding of pheromones by vomeronasal receptors.Cell and tissue research · 2021Review
- The vomeronasal organ of wild canids: the fox (Vulpes vulpes) as a model.Journal of anatomy · 2020Article
- Distinct evolutionary trajectories of V1R clades across mouse species.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- Review
- TAAR Agonists.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2020Review
- Multimodal Imaging and Analysis of the Neuroanatomical Organization of the Primary Olfactory Inputs in the Brownbanded Bamboo Shark,Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2020Article
- Convergent reduction of V1R genes in subterranean rodents.BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
- Sense of Smell: Structural, Functional, Mechanistic Advancements and Challenges in Human Olfactory Research.Current neuropharmacology · 2019Article
- Penguins reduced olfactory receptor genes common to other waterbirds.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Article
- Trace amine-associated receptors: ligands, neural circuits, and behaviors.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2015Review
- Evolution of spatially coexpressed families of type-2 vomeronasal receptors in rodents.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Most tetrapod vertebrates have 2 olfactory systems, the main olfactory system (MOS) and the vomeronasal system (VNS). According to the dual olfactory hypothesis, the MOS detects environmental odorants, whereas the VNS recognizes intraspecific pheromonal cues. However, this strict functional distinction has been blurred by recent reports that both systems can perceive both types of signals. Studies of a limited number of receptors suggest that MOS receptors are broadly tuned generalists, whereas VNS receptors are narrowly tuned specialists. However, whether this distinction applies to all MOS and VNS receptors remains unknown. The differential tuning hypothesis predicts that generalist MOS receptors detect an overlapping set of ligands and thus are more likely to be conserved over evolutionary time than specialist VNS receptors, which would evolve in a more lineage-specific manner. Here we test this prediction for all olfactory chemoreceptors by examining the evolutionary patterns of MOS-expressed odorant receptors (ORs) and trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) and VNS-expressed vomeronasal type 1 receptors (V1Rs) and vomeronasal type 2 receptors (V2Rs) in 7 tetrapods (mouse, rat, dog, opossum, platypus, chicken, and frog). The phylogenies of V1Rs and V2Rs show abundant lineage-specific gene gains/losses and virtually no one-to-one orthologs between species. Opposite patterns are found for ORs and TAARs. Analysis of functional data and ligand-binding sites of ORs confirms that paralogous chemoreceptors are more likely than orthologs to have different ligands and that functional divergence between paralogous chemoreceptors is established relatively quickly following gene duplication. Together, these results strongly suggest that the functional profile of the VNS chemoreceptor repertoire evolves much faster than that of the MOS chemoreceptor repertoire and that the differential tuning hypothesis applies to the majority, if not all, of MOS and VNS receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.