Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18460187›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008

Facilitating the development of controlled vocabularies for metabolomics technologies with text mining.

Irena Spasić, Daniel Schober, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann, Douglas B Kell, Norman W Paton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Improved ontology for eukaryotic single-exon coding sequences in biological databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Getting started in text mining: part two.PLoS computational biology · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irena SpasićManchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7ND, UK. i.spasic@manchester.ac.uk
Daniel Schober
Susanna-Assunta Sansone
Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann
Douglas B Kell
Norman W Paton

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C008219/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C519038/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D524283/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E016065/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E025080/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council MET20484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany bioinformatics applications rely on controlled vocabularies or ontologies to consistently interpret and seamlessly integrate information scattered across public resources. Experimental data sets from metabolomics studies need to be integrated with one another, but also with data produced by other types of omics studies in the spirit of systems biology, hence the pressing need for vocabularies and ontologies in metabolomics. However, it is time-consuming and non trivial to construct these resources manually.

resultsWe describe a methodology for rapid development of controlled vocabularies, a study originally motivated by the needs for vocabularies describing metabolomics technologies. We present case studies involving two controlled vocabularies (for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and gas chromatography) whose development is currently underway as part of the Metabolomics Standards Initiative. The initial vocabularies were compiled manually, providing a total of 243 and 152 terms. A total of 5,699 and 2,612 new terms were acquired automatically from the literature. The analysis of the results showed that full-text articles (especially the Materials and Methods sections) are the major source of technology-specific terms as opposed to paper abstracts.

conclusionsWe suggest a text mining method for efficient corpus-based term acquisition as a way of rapidly expanding a set of controlled vocabularies with the terms used in the scientific literature. We adopted an integrative approach, combining relatively generic software and data resources for time- and cost-effective development of a text mining tool for expansion of controlled vocabularies across various domains, as a practical alternative to both manual term collection and tailor-made named entity recognition methods.

Indexed as

MetabolismUser-Computer InterfaceVocabulary, ControlledAbstracting and IndexingChromatography, GasInformation Storage and RetrievalMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMEDLINENatural Language ProcessingPattern Recognition, AutomatedSystems BiologySystems IntegrationTechnologyTerminology as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18460187
PMCPMC2367623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.