ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2008
A review of interventions and system changes to improve time to reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using evidence briefs to support future implementation planning: the case of early fibrinolysis for myocardial infarction and rehabilitation for the amputee patient in Colombia.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Practice and Evaluation of a Protocol for Collating Information Related to the Emergency Clinical Pathway for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Improving door-to-needle times for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction at a rural district general hospital.BMJ quality improvement reports · 2016Article
- Prostate cancer survivorship care in the Veterans Health Administration.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2014Article
- Minimizing transfer time to an ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-receiving center: a modified Delphi consensus.Critical pathways in cardiology · 2014Article
- Factors associated with presenting >12 hours after symptom onset of acute myocardial infarction among Veteran men.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIdentify and describe interventions to reduce time to reperfusion for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). DATA SOURCE: Key word searches of five research databases: MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry.
interventionsWe included controlled and uncontrolled studies of interventions to reduce time to reperfusion. One researcher reviewed abstracts and 2 reviewed full text articles. Articles were subsequently abstracted into structured data tables, which included study design, setting, intervention, and outcome variables. We inductively developed intervention categories from the articles. A second researcher reviewed data abstraction for accuracy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWe identified 666 articles, 42 of which met inclusion criteria. We identified 11 intervention categories and classified them as either process specific (e.g., emergency department administration of thrombolytic therapy, activation of the catheterization laboratory by emergency department personnel) or system level (e.g., continuous quality improvement, critical pathways). A majority of studies (59%) were single-site pre/post design, and nearly half (47%) had sample sizes less than 100 patients. Thirty-two studies (76%) reported significantly lower door to reperfusion times associated with an intervention, 12 (29%) of which met or exceeded guideline recommended times. Relative decreases in times to reperfusion ranged from 15 to 82% for door to needle and 13-64% for door to balloon.
conclusionsWe identified an array of process and system-based quality improvement interventions associated with significant improvements in door to reperfusion time. However, weak study designs and inadequate information about implementation limit the usefulness of this literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.